Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases
- PMID: 27211503
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013
Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases
Abstract
Background & aims: Diseases of the stomach, including gastric cancer and peptic ulcer, are the most common digestive diseases. It is impossible to visualize the entire stomach with the passive capsule currently used in practice because of the large size of the gastric cavity. A magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system has been designed to explore the stomach. We performed a prospective study to compare the accuracy of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE vs conventional gastroscopy (the standard method).
Methods: We performed a multicenter blinded study comparing MCE with conventional gastroscopy in 350 patients (mean age, 46.6 y), with upper abdominal complaints scheduled to undergo gastroscopy at a tertiary center in China from August 2014 through December 2014. All patients underwent MCE, followed by conventional gastroscopy 2 hours later, without sedation. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE, using gastroscopy as the standard.
Results: MCE detected gastric focal lesions in the whole stomach with 90.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.7%-96.1%), 94.7% specificity (95% CI, 91.9%-97.5%), a positive predictive value of 87.9% (95% CI, 81.7%-94.0%), a negative predictive value of 95.9% (95% CI, 93.4%-98.4%), and 93.4% accuracy (95% CI, 90.83%-96.02%). MCE detected focal lesions in the upper stomach (cardia, fundus, and body) with 90.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.0%-98.4%) and 96.7% specificity (95% CI, 94.4%-98.9%). MCE detected focal lesions in the lower stomach (angulus, antrum, and pylorus) with 90.6% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.7%-98.4%) and 97.9% specificity (95% CI, 96.1%-99.7%). MCE detected 1 advanced gastric carcinoma, 2 malignant lymphomas, and 1 early stage gastric tumor. MCE did not miss any lesions of significance (including tumors or large ulcers). Among the 350 patients, 5 reported 9 adverse events (1.4%) and 335 preferred MCE over gastroscopy (95.7%).
Conclusions: MCE detects focal lesions in the upper and lower stomach with comparable accuracy with conventional gastroscopy. MCE is preferred by almost all patients, compared with gastroscopy, and can be used to screen gastric diseases without sedation. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02219529.
Keywords: Diagnostic Accuracy; Gastric Diseases; Gastroscopy; Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy; Screening.
Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Magnetically guided capsule versus conventional gastroscopy for upper abdominal complaints: a prospective blinded study.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;49(2):101-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000110. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 24618504 Clinical Trial.
-
Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy as the first-line examination for high-risk patients for the standard gastroscopy: a preliminary study.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;54(7):934-937. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1638446. Epub 2019 Jul 22. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31328998
-
Magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy vs. gastroscopy for gastric diseases: a two-center self-controlled comparative trial.Endoscopy. 2015 Jun;47(6):525-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391123. Epub 2015 Jan 15. Endoscopy. 2015. PMID: 25590177 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical application of magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy in gastric disease diagnosis: recent advances.Sci China Life Sci. 2018 Nov;61(11):1304-1309. doi: 10.1007/s11427-018-9353-5. Epub 2018 Oct 18. Sci China Life Sci. 2018. PMID: 30367341 Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of magnetic guided capsule gastroscopy in gastric diseases.Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019 Oct-Dec;82(4):507-513. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019. PMID: 31950806 Review.
Cited by
-
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel wired transmission magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy system for upper gastrointestinal examination.Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9454-9461. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09603-1. Epub 2022 Sep 16. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 36112221
-
Prevalence of Gastric and Small-Intestinal Mucosal Injury in Elderly Patients Taking Enteric-Coated Aspirin by Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Nov 5;2019:1582590. doi: 10.1155/2019/1582590. eCollection 2019. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019. PMID: 31781185 Free PMC article.
-
Upper gastrointestinal tract capsule endoscopy using a nurse-led protocol: First reported experience.World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 14;24(26):2893-2901. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2893. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30018484 Free PMC article.
-
Miniature gastrointestinal endoscopy: Now and the future.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 14;25(30):4051-4060. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i30.4051. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31435163 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy in one-time gastro-small intestinal joint examination: a two-centre experience.BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 May 4;22(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02302-0. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35509022 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical