Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 19;16(5):731.
doi: 10.3390/s16050731.

Recognizing Physisorption and Chemisorption in Carbon Nanotubes Gas Sensors by Double Exponential Fitting of the Response

Affiliations

Recognizing Physisorption and Chemisorption in Carbon Nanotubes Gas Sensors by Double Exponential Fitting of the Response

Andrea Calvi et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been grown in situ on a SiO 2 substrate and used as gas sensors. For this purpose, the voltage response of the CNTs as a function of time has been used to detect H 2 and CO 2 at various concentrations by supplying a constant current to the system. The analysis of both adsorptions and desorptions curves has revealed two different exponential behaviours for each curve. The study of the characteristic times, obtained from the fitting of the data, has allowed us to identify separately chemisorption and physisorption processes on the CNTs.

Keywords: CNTs sensors; chemisorption; physisorption.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(Left) A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image from the vertically aligned grown samples; (Right) Particular of the tips from the grown nanotubes. From this image it is clear that the natotubes twine at the tips. The diameter of the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can be estimated to be around 10 nm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical set of voltage vs time data. The response can be also seen as variations in measured resistivity. Measured data for the hydrogen case. (Left) Exposure to 0.25 ppm; (Right) Exposure to 0.02 and 0.16 ppm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Single exponential fit for the measured curves for hydrogen at 0.16 ppm. (Left) Ascent curve; (Right) Descent curve.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(Left) Dispersion plot showing decreasing response times as function of increasing gas concentrations; (Right) Decomposition of desorption process in terms of the model used (see text).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Double exponential fit for hydrogen. As it can be seen, a better agreement is reached with respect to single exponential fit. (Left) Ascent curve; (Right) Descent curve.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Set of data for the CO2 case. Data show the response of the sensor for gas concentrations of 0.05 ppm and 0.20 ppm.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Double exponential fit for carbon dioxide. (Left) Ascent curve; (Right) Descent curve.

References

    1. Liu X., Cheng S., Liu H., Hu S., Zhang D., Ning H. A survey on gas sensing technology. Sensors. 2012;12:9635–9665. doi: 10.3390/s120709635. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinha N., Ma J., Yeow J.T. Carbon nanotube-based sensors. J. Nanosc. Nanotech. 2006;6:573–590. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2006.121. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahman M.M., Ahammad A., Jin J.-H., Ahn S.J., Lee J.J. A comprehensive review of glucose biosensors based on nanostructured metal-oxides. Sensors. 2010;10:4855–4886. doi: 10.3390/s100504855. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Y., Yeow J.T. A review of carbon nanotubes-based gas sensors. J. Sens. 2009;2009:1–24. doi: 10.1155/2009/493904. - DOI
    1. Jimenez-Cadena G., Riu J., Rius F.X. Gas sensors based on nanostructured materials. Analyst. 2007;132:1083–1099. doi: 10.1039/b704562j. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources