Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May 4:9:211-7.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S104807. eCollection 2016.

Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods

Affiliations
Review

Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods

Alaa Althubaiti. J Multidiscip Healthc. .

Abstract

As with other fields, medical sciences are subject to different sources of bias. While understanding sources of bias is a key element for drawing valid conclusions, bias in health research continues to be a very sensitive issue that can affect the focus and outcome of investigations. Information bias, otherwise known as misclassification, is one of the most common sources of bias that affects the validity of health research. It originates from the approach that is utilized to obtain or confirm study measurements. This paper seeks to raise awareness of information bias in observational and experimental research study designs as well as to enrich discussions concerning bias problems. Specifying the types of bias can be essential to limit its effects and, the use of adjustment methods might serve to improve clinical evaluation and health care practice.

Keywords: confirmation bias; measurement error bias; misclassification; recall bias; self-report bias; social desirability bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company; 1987.
    1. Gerhard T. Bias: considerations for research practice. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(22):2159–2168. - PubMed
    1. Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619–625. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi BCK, Pak AWP. Bias, Overview. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2005.
    1. Zhu K, McKnight B, Stergachis A, Daling JR, Levine RS. Comparison of self-report data and medical records data: results from a case-control study on prostate cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(3):409–417. - PubMed