Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods
- PMID: 27217764
- PMCID: PMC4862344
- DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S104807
Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods
Abstract
As with other fields, medical sciences are subject to different sources of bias. While understanding sources of bias is a key element for drawing valid conclusions, bias in health research continues to be a very sensitive issue that can affect the focus and outcome of investigations. Information bias, otherwise known as misclassification, is one of the most common sources of bias that affects the validity of health research. It originates from the approach that is utilized to obtain or confirm study measurements. This paper seeks to raise awareness of information bias in observational and experimental research study designs as well as to enrich discussions concerning bias problems. Specifying the types of bias can be essential to limit its effects and, the use of adjustment methods might serve to improve clinical evaluation and health care practice.
Keywords: confirmation bias; measurement error bias; misclassification; recall bias; self-report bias; social desirability bias.
References
-
- Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company; 1987.
-
- Gerhard T. Bias: considerations for research practice. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(22):2159–2168. - PubMed
-
- Choi BCK, Pak AWP. Bias, Overview. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2005.
-
- Zhu K, McKnight B, Stergachis A, Daling JR, Levine RS. Comparison of self-report data and medical records data: results from a case-control study on prostate cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(3):409–417. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials