Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May 3:8:79-87.
doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S63465. eCollection 2016.

Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options

Affiliations
Review

Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options

Marcelle M Nascimento et al. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. .

Abstract

Abfraction is a type of noncarious cervical lesion (NCCL) characterized by loss of tooth tissues with different clinical appearances. Evidence supports that abfraction lesions, as any NCCLs, have a multifactorial etiology. Particularly, the cervical wear of abfraction can occur as a result of normal and abnormal tooth function and may also be accompanied by pathological wear, such as abrasion and erosion. The interaction between chemical, biological, and behavioral factors is critical and helps to explain why some individuals exhibit more than one type of cervical wear mechanism than others. In an era of personalized dentistry, patient risk factors for NCCLs must be identified and addressed before any treatment is performed. Marked variations exist in dental practice concerning the diagnosis and management of these lesions. The lack of understanding about the prognosis of these lesions with or without intervention may be a major contributor to variations in dentists' management decisions. This review focuses on the current knowledge and available treatment strategies for abfraction lesions. By recognizing that progressive changes in the cervical area of the tooth are part of a physiologically dynamic process that occurs with aging, premature and unnecessary intervention can be avoided. In cases of asymptomatic teeth, where tooth vitality and function are not compromised, abfraction lesions should be monitored for at least 6 months before any invasive procedure is planned. In cases of abfraction associated with gingival recession, a combined restorative-surgical approach may be performed. Restorative intervention and occlusal adjustment are not indicated as treatment options to prevent further tooth loss or progression of abfraction. The clinical decision to restore abfraction lesions may be based on the need to replace form and function or to relieve hypersensitivity of severely compromised teeth or for esthetic reasons.

Keywords: abfraction; noncarious cervical lesions; tooth restoration; tooth wear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scheme of pathodynamic mechanisms involved in NCCLs as proposed by Grippo et al. Note: © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Reproduced from John Wiley and Sons. Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(1):10–23. Abbreviations: NCCL, noncarious cervical lesion; HCl, hydrochloric acid.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A typical abfraction lesion in a patient with multiple types of NCCLs. Notes: Arrow shows the second upper premolar with the typical lesion. Originally published in Inside Dentistry. © 2011 AEGIS Publications, LLC. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission of the publishers. Abbreviation: NCCL, noncarious cervical lesion.
Figure 3
Figure 3
An elderly patient exhibiting NCCLs in the whole dentition. Note: Courtesy of Dr Alex J Delgado. Abbreviation: NCCL, noncarious cervical lesion.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Abfraction lesions of different shapes, widths, and depths, characteristic of their different stages of progression. Note: Courtesy of Dr Alex J Delgado.

References

    1. Mjor IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 5: clinical management and tissue changes associated with wear and trauma. Quintessence Int. 2001;32(10):771–788. - PubMed
    1. Bartlett DW, Shah P. A critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion, and abrasion. J Dent Res. 2006;85(4):306–312. - PubMed
    1. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52(3):374–380. - PubMed
    1. Grippo JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3(1):14–19. - PubMed
    1. Michael JA, Townsend GC, Greenwood LF, Kaidonis JA. Abfraction: separating fact from fiction. Aust Dent J. 2009;54(1):2–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources