Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;49(4):282-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00391-016-1067-4. Epub 2016 May 25.

Social service robots to support independent living : Experiences from a field trial

Affiliations

Social service robots to support independent living : Experiences from a field trial

J Pripfl et al. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Assistive robots could be a future means to support independent living for seniors.

Objective: This article provides insights into the latest developments in social service robots (SSR) based on the recently finished HOBBIT project. The idea of the HOBBIT project was to develop a low-cost SSR which is able to reduce the risk of falling, to detect falls and handle emergencies in private homes. The main objective of the project was to raise the technology to a level that allows the robot to be fully autonomously deployed in the private homes of older users and to evaluate technology market readiness, utility, usability and affordability under real-world conditions.

Method: During the initial phase of the project, a first prototype (PT1) was developed. The results of laboratory tests with PT1 were used for the development of a second prototype (PT2), which was finally tested in seven households of senior adults (mean age 79 years) for 3 weeks each, i.e. in total more than 5 months.

Results: The results showed that PT2 is intuitive to handle and that the functions offered meet the needs of older users; however, the robot was considered more as a toy than a supportive device for independent living. Furthermore, despite an emergency function of the robot, perceived security did not increase.

Conclusion: Reasons for this might be a lack of technological robustness and slow performance of the prototype and also the good health conditions of the users; however, users believed that a market-ready version of the robot would be vital for supporting people who are more fragile and more socially isolated. Thus, SSRs have the potential to support independent living of older people although the technology has to be considerably improved to reach market readiness.

Keywords: Assistive technologies; Falls; Independent living; Robotics; Technology acceptance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Dec;47(8):661-5 - PubMed
    1. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jun;47(6):762-73 - PubMed
    1. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jul 23;7:141 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):1-15 - PubMed
    1. Age Ageing. 2005 Nov;34(6):614-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources