A comparison of wearable fitness devices
- PMID: 27220855
- PMCID: PMC4877805
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3059-0
A comparison of wearable fitness devices
Abstract
Background: Wearable trackers can help motivate you during workouts and provide information about your daily routine or fitness in combination with your smartphone without requiring potentially disruptive manual calculations or records. This paper summarizes and compares wearable fitness devices, also called "fitness trackers" or "activity trackers." These devices are becoming increasingly popular in personal healthcare, motivating people to exercise more throughout the day without the need for lifestyle changes. The various choices in the market for wearable devices are also increasing, with customers searching for products that best suit their personal needs. Further, using a wearable device or fitness tracker can help people reach a fitness goal or finish line. Generally, companies display advertising for these kinds of products and depict them as beneficial, user friendly, and accurate. However, there are no objective research results to prove the veracity of their words. This research features subjective and objective experimental results, which reveal that some devices perform better than others.
Methods: The four most popular wristband style wearable devices currently on the market (Withings Pulse, Misfit Shine, Jawbone Up24, and Fitbit Flex) are selected and compared. The accuracy of fitness tracking is one of the key components for fitness tracking, and some devices perform better than others. This research shows subjective and objective experimental results that are used to compare the accuracy of four wearable devices in conjunction with user friendliness and satisfaction of 7 real users. In addition, this research matches the opinions between reviewers on an Internet site and those of subjects when using the device.
Results: Withings Pulse is the most friendly and satisfactory from the users' viewpoint. It is the most accurate and repeatable for step and distance tracking, which is the most important measurement of fitness tracking, followed by Fitbit Flex, Jawbone Up24, and Misfit Shine. In contrast, Misfit Shine has the highest score for design and hardware, which is also appreciated by users.
Conclusions: From the results of experiments on four wearable devices, it is determined that the most acceptable in terms of price and satisfaction levels is the Withings Pulse, followed by the Fitbit Flex, Jawbone Up24, and Misfit Shine.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jan 27;4(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4225. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016. PMID: 26818775 Free PMC article.
-
Behavior Change Techniques Present in Wearable Activity Trackers: A Critical Analysis.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Apr 27;4(2):e40. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4461. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016. PMID: 27122452 Free PMC article.
-
How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Apr;17(3):360-368. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1255261. Epub 2016 Dec 2. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017. PMID: 27912681
-
How consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017 Mar 1;312(3):R358-R367. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00349.2016. Epub 2017 Jan 4. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28052867 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of Fitbit Devices: Systematic Review and Narrative Syntheses of Quantitative Data.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 9;6(8):e10527. doi: 10.2196/10527. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018. PMID: 30093371 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Are Activity Wrist-Worn Devices Accurate for Determining Heart Rate during Intense Exercise?Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;10(2):254. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020254. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36829748 Free PMC article.
-
An Integration of Health Tracking Sensor Applications and eLearning Environments for Cloud-Based Health Promotion Campaigns.IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging. 2018;2018:1141-1148. doi: 10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2018.06.mobmu-114. Epub 2018 Jan 28. IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging. 2018. PMID: 34164588 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluations of Commercial Sleep Technologies for Objective Monitoring During Routine Sleeping Conditions.Nat Sci Sleep. 2020 Oct 27;12:821-842. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S270705. eCollection 2020. Nat Sci Sleep. 2020. PMID: 33149712 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitators of and Barriers to Teachers' Engagement With Consumer Technologies for Stress Management: Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 22;26:e50457. doi: 10.2196/50457. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39437381 Free PMC article.
-
Wearable electrochemical biosensors to measure biomarkers with complex blood-to-sweat partition such as proteins and hormones.Mikrochim Acta. 2022 Mar 1;189(3):127. doi: 10.1007/s00604-022-05228-2. Mikrochim Acta. 2022. PMID: 35233646 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Tehrani, Kiana and Michael A. Wearable Technology and Wearable Devices everything you need to know. In: Wearable Devices.com. 2014. http://www.wearabledevices.com/what-is-a-wearable-device. Accessed Mar 2014.
-
- Scoble R, Israel S: Activity Tracker. In: Wikipedia.com, Age of Context: Mobile, Sensors, Data and the Future of Privacy. 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activity_tracker. Accessed Aug 2015.
-
- Swider M.: Google Glass review. In Techradar. 2015. http://www.techradar.com/reviews/gadgets/google-glass-1152283/review. Accessed 20 Feb 2015.
-
- The Hicon Team: Hicon smart wristband with social network icons. In Indeegogo.com. 2015. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/hicon-smartwristband-with-social-netw.... Accessed 15 Feb 2015.
-
- Withings: Pulse Ox Track Improve. In: Withings Inspire Health. 2009–2015. http://www.withings.com/eu/withings-pulse.html. Accessed 2009
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical