Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;7(3):137-44.
doi: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1187346.

Bioengineering microbial communities: Their potential to help, hinder and disgust

Affiliations

Bioengineering microbial communities: Their potential to help, hinder and disgust

Diane Sivasubramaniam et al. Bioengineered. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

The bioengineering of individual microbial organisms or microbial communities has great potential in agriculture, bioremediation and industry. Understanding community level drivers can improve community level functions to enhance desired outcomes in complex environments, whereas individual microbes can be reduced to a programmable biological unit for specific output goals. While understanding the bioengineering potential of both approaches leads to a wide range of potential uses, public acceptance of such technology may be the greatest hindrance to its application. Public perceptions and expectations of "naturalness," as well as notions of disgust and dread, may delay the development of such technologies to their full benefit. We discuss these bioengineering approaches and draw on the psychological literature to suggest strategies that scientists can use to allay public concerns over the implementation of this technology.

Keywords: artificial; community function; dread; function; gene circuits; genetic engineering; naturalness; synthetic biology; trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Madsen EL. Microorganisms and their roles in fundamental biogeochemical cycles. Curr Opinion Biotechnol 2011; 22:456-64; PMID:21333523; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.01.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curtis TP, Sloan WT, Scannell JW. Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:10494-9; PMID:12097644; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142680199. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grosskopf T, Soyer OS. Synthetic microbial communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 2014; 18:72-7; PMID:24632350; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2014.02.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dworkin M. Sergei Winogradsky: a founder of modern microbiology and the first microbial ecologist. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2012; 36:364-79; PMID:22092289; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00299.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guhathakurta H, Biswas R, Dey P, Mahapatra PG, Mondal B. Effect of organic forms of phosphorus and variable concentrations of sulfide on the metabolic generation of soluble-reactive phosphate by sulfur chemolithoautotrophs: a laboratory study. ISME J 2007; 1:545-50; PMID:18043655; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.61. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms