Application of the Healthy Eating Index-2010 to the hunger relief system
- PMID: 27221768
- PMCID: PMC10271198
- DOI: 10.1017/S136898001600118X
Application of the Healthy Eating Index-2010 to the hunger relief system
Abstract
Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of applying the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) to the hunger relief setting, specifically by assessing the nutritional quality of foods ordered by food shelves (front-line food provider) from food banks (warehouse of foods).
Design: This Healthy FOOD (Feedback On Ordering Decisions) observational study used electronic invoices detailing orders made by 269 food shelves in 2013 and analysed in 2015 from two large Minnesota, USA food banks to generate HEI-2010 scores. Initial development and processing procedures are described.
Results: The average total HEI-2010 score for the 269 food shelves was 62·7 out of 100 with a range from 28 to 82. Mean component scores for total protein foods, total vegetables, fatty acids, and seafood and plant proteins were the highest. Mean component score for whole grains was the lowest followed by dairy, total fruits, refined grains and sodium. Food shelves located in micropolitan areas and the largest food shelves had the highest HEI-2010 scores. Town/rural and smaller food shelves had the lowest scores. Monthly and seasonal differences in scores were detected. Limitations to this approach are identified.
Conclusions: Calculating HEI-2010 for food shelves using electronic invoice data is novel and feasible, albeit with limitations. HEI-2010 scores for 2013 identify room for improvement in nearly all food shelves, especially the smallest agencies. The utility of providing HEI-2010 scores to decision makers in the hunger relief setting is an issue requiring urgent study.
Keywords: Emergency food; Food bank measurement; Food evaluation; Healthy Eating Index; Healthy food access.
Figures
) and quarter (
), 2013. aQuarter 1 (Jan, Feb, Mar) is significantly lower than quarter 2 (Apr, May, Jun; 59·5 v. 62·7, P=0·0035) and quarter 3 (Jul, Aug, Sep; 59·5 v. 63·1, P=0·0007). bQuarter 3 (Jul, Aug, Sep) is significantly higher than quarter 4 (Oct, Nov, Dec; 63·1 v. 60·1, P=0·0221)References
-
- Feeding America (2014) 2014 Annual Report: Bringing Hope to 46 Million People. http://www.feedingamerica.org/our-response/about-us/annual-report/2014-a... (accessed June 2015).
-
- Campbell E, Webb K, Ross M et al.. (2015) Nutrition-Focused Food Banking. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; available at http://nam.edu/perspectives-2015-nutrition-focused-food-banking/
-
- Weinfield N, Mills G, Borger C et al.. (2014) Hunger in America 2014. National Report Prepared for Feeding America. http://help.feedingamerica.org/HungerInAmerica/hunger-in-america-2014-fu... (accessed June 2015).
-
- Coleman-Jensen A, Rabbit M, Gregory C et al.. (2015) Household Food Security in the United States in 2014, Economic Research Report no. ERR-194. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
-
- Drewnowski A & Specter S (2004) Poverty and obesity: the role of energy density and energy costs. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 6–16. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
