Impact of thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke without occlusion: an observational comparative study

Abstract

Background and purpose: The impact of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-rtPA) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) but no arterial occlusion is currently a matter of debate. This study aimed to assess functional outcome of such patients with respect to IV-rtPA use.

Methods: A retrospective case-control analysis was performed comparing the outcome of AIS patients without arterial occlusion with or without IV-rtPA use. Patients were selected from prospective consecutive observational registries of five European university hospitals. The primary study outcome was excellent outcome at 3 months after stroke, as defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1.

Results: A total of 488 patients without arterial occlusion documented by angiography were included in the present study; 300 received IV-rtPA and 188 did not. No between-group difference was found for excellent outcome before and after adjustment for baseline characteristics (adjusted odds ratio for no IV-rtPA use 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.24, P = 0.31). Similar results were found for favourable outcome (defined as a 90-day mRS of 0-2) whereas a higher rate of early neurological improvement was found in IV-rtPA-treated patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.99; 95% confidence interval 1.29-3.07, P = 0.002). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that AIS patients without visible arterial occlusion treated with IV-rtPA may have no better outcome at 3 months than those untreated. However, only a randomized controlled trial would provide a definitive answer about the impact of rtPA in acute stroke patients without occlusion. Until then, these patients should be treated by rtPA as recommended.

Keywords: arterial occlusion; ischaemic stroke; outcome; thrombolysis.