Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Dec;87(6):541-545.
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1191275. Epub 2016 May 26.

Overtreatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Overtreatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures

Ilija Ban et al. Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background and purpose - The best treatment for displaced clavicle fractures has been debated for decades. Operative treatment has become more common. However, several randomized trials comparing non-operative and operative treatment have not shown any compelling evidence in favor of surgery. We identified the preferred treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures at public hospitals in 3 countries in Scandinavia. Patients and methods - A purpose-made multiple-choice questionnaire in English was sent to all public hospitals in Denmark, Sweden, and Finland. This was addressed to the orthopedic surgeon responsible for treatment of clavicle fractures, and completed questionnaires were obtained from 85 of 118 hospitals. Results - In the 3 countries, 69 of the 85 hospitals that responded would treat displaced clavicle fractures operatively. Clear criteria for treatment allocation were used at 58 of the hospitals, with the remaining 27 using individual assessment in collaboration with the patient. Precontoured locking plates were mostly used, placed either superiorly (64/85) or anteriorly (10/85). Interpretation - Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures are mainly treated operatively in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. This treatment is not supported by compelling evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A typical displaced midshaft fracture with a displacement of more than 1 bone width, some degree of shortening, and several intermediary fragments.

References

    1. Andersen K, Jensen P O, Lauritzen J.. Treatment of clavicular fractures. Figure-of-eight bandage versus a simple sling. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 58(1): 71–4. - PubMed
    1. Ban I, Troelsen A.. Risk profile of patients developing nonunion of the clavicle and outcome of treatment – analysis of fifty five nonunions in seven houndred and twenty nine consecutive fractures. Int Orthop 2016; Feb 4 [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed
    1. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(1): 1–10. - PubMed
    1. Eden L, Doht S, Frey SP, Ziegler D, Stoyhe J, Fehske K, Blunk T, Meffert R H.. Biomechanical comparison of the Locking Compression superior clavicle plate with seven and ten hole reconstruction plates in midshaft clavicle fracture stabilisation. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 2537–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ersen A, Atalar A C, Birisik F, Saglam Y, Demirhan M.. Comparison of simple arm sling and figure of eight clavicular bandage for midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomised controlled study. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B: 1562–5. - PubMed

Publication types