Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar;25(3):729-735.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4173-3. Epub 2016 May 25.

Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Yihui Tu et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Oxford microplasty (MP) instrumentation has been developed to facilitate the reproducible and consistent performance of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MI-UKA) operation. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of two groups of patients implanted using either a conventional instrumentation technique or an MP technique.

Methods: A prospective cohort study of 108 knees in 108 patients who underwent an MI-UKA procedure using either conventionally instrumented UKA (CI-UKA) (52 knees of 52 patients) or MP-assisted UKA (MP-UKA) (56 knees of 56 patients). The clinical assessment included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Knee Society Score (KSS), a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and range of motion (ROM). Complications were also recorded.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding OKS, KSS, VAS, and ROM. There were also no significant differences in terms of mechanical limb alignment and tibia implant alignment. However, the MP-UKA group showed significantly more accurate positioning of the femoral component than the CI-UKA group. Additionally, the MP-UKA group had more femoral prostheses implanted in the "satisfactory" range and fewer "outliers" than the CI-UKA group. No significant difference in complications was noted between the two groups.

Conclusion: This study suggested that compared with CI-UKA, MP-UKA provides significant improvements in increasing the accuracy of sagittal and coronal implantation of the femoral component and in reducing the numbers of outliers for femoral prosthetic alignment. It is advocated that the MP system should be considered when MI-UKA is performed.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV.

Keywords: Clinical results; Component alignment; Knee arthroplasty; Mobile-bearing; Oxford; Unicompartmental.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int Orthop. 2013 May;37(5):833-8 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Mar;83(2):191-4 - PubMed
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Nov;15(11):1331-4 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Feb;21(2):271-8 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A Suppl 2:90-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources