Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016:3:166-174.
doi: 10.1007/s40429-016-0099-6. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

Mobile Interventions Targeting Risky Drinking Among University Students: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Mobile Interventions Targeting Risky Drinking Among University Students: A Review

Anne H Berman et al. Curr Addict Rep. 2016.

Abstract

Mobile interventions based on text messages, automated telephone programs (interactive voice response (IVR)), and smartphone apps offer a new approach targeting hazardous alcohol use in university students. This review covers seven recent studies involving college or university students that evaluated intervention efficacy in comparison to controls: four using text messages, one using IVR, and two smartphone apps. Only the study evaluating IVR reported positive results for the primary outcome. Two of the text message studies reported positive results on secondary outcomes, while the other two reported no differences in comparison to control groups. For smartphone apps, one study reported positive results on secondary outcomes, while the other showed no differences in comparison to controls for a web-based app and negative results for a native app. Further development of mobile interventions is needed for this at-risk population, both in terms of intervention content and use of robust research designs.

Keywords: Alcohol; Automated telephony; Hazardous drinking; Intervention; Review; Smartphone apps; Text messages; University/college students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of review process

References

    1. Plant MA, Plant ML, Miller P, Gmel G, Kuntsche S. The social consequences of binge drinking: a comparison of young adults in six European countries. J Addict Dis. 2009;28:294–308. doi: 10.1080/10550880903182978. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future: national survey results on drug use, 1975–2012. Volume 2: college students and adults ages 19–50. Ann Arbor: Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan; 2013.
    1. O’Neill SE, Parra GR, Sher KJ. Clinical relevance of heavy drinking during the college years: cross-sectional and prospective perspectives. Psychol Addict Behav. 2001;15:350. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.15.4.350. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuckit MA. Comorbidity between substance use disorders and psychiatric conditions. Addiction. 2006;101:76–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01592.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larimer ME, Cronce JM. Identification, prevention and treatment: a review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2002;148. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources