Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156133.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156133. eCollection 2016.

Comparison of Photoselective Vaporization versus Holmium Laser Enucleation for Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia in a Small Prostate Volume

Kang Sup Kim  1 , Jin Bong Choi  1 , Woong Jin Bae  1 , Su Jin Kim  1 , Hyuk Jin Cho  1 , Sung-Hoo Hong  1 , Ji Youl Lee  1 , Sang Hoon Kim  2 , Hyun Woo Kim  2 , Su Yeon Cho  2 , Sae Woong Kim  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Photoselective Vaporization versus Holmium Laser Enucleation for Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia in a Small Prostate Volume

Kang Sup Kim et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using GreenLight and Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an important surgical technique for management of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PVP using a 120 W GreenLight laser with HoLEP in a small prostate volume.

Methods: Patients who underwent PVP or HoLEP surgery for BPH at our institutions were reviewed from May 2009 to December 2014 in this retrospective study. Among them, patients with prostate volumes < 40 mL based on preoperative trans-rectal ultrasonography were included in this study. Peri-operative and post-operative parameters-such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), and complications-were compared between the groups.

Results: PVP was performed in 176 patients and HoLEP in162 patients. Preoperative demographic data were similar in both groups, with the exception of PVR. Operative time and catheter duration did not show significant difference. Significant improvements compared to preoperative values were verified at the postoperative evaluation in both groups in terms of IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and PVR. Comparison of the postoperative parameters between the PVP and HoLEP groups demonstrated no significant difference, with the exception of IPSS voiding subscore at 1 month postoperatively (5.9 vs. 3.8, P< 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that PVP and HoLEP are efficient and safe surgical treatment options for patients with small prostate volume.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Changes in Qmax (A) and PVR (B) in the PVP and HoLEP groups.
Qmax, urinary peak flow rate; PVR, post-voiding residual urine; PVP, photoselective vaporization of the prostate; HoLEP, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. * P < 0.05; compared with preoperative parameters.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. The Journal of urology. 1984;132(3):474–9. . - PubMed
    1. Madersbacher S, Klingler HC, Djavan B, Stulnig T, Schatzl G, Schmidbauer CP, et al. Is obstruction predictable by clinical evaluation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms? British journal of urology. 1997;80(1):72–7. . - PubMed
    1. Rosier PF, de la Rosette JJ, Wijkstra H, Van Kerrebroeck PE, Debruyne FM. Is detrusor instability in elderly males related to the grade of obstruction? Neurourology and urodynamics. 1995;14(6):625–33. . - PubMed
    1. Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Seitz M, Schlenker B, Hermanek P, et al. Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. The Journal of urology. 2008;180(1):246–9. 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.058 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Capitan C, Blazquez C, Martin MD, Hernandez V, de la Pena E, Llorente C. GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. European urology. 2011;60(4):734–9. 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.043 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types