Perioperative and follow-up results in carotid artery stenting with contralateral carotid occlusion
- PMID: 27230906
- DOI: 10.1007/s11604-016-0554-2
Perioperative and follow-up results in carotid artery stenting with contralateral carotid occlusion
Abstract
Purpose: Contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) increases the risk of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We determined the outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS), an alternative to CEA, in the setting of CCO through an independent analysis of imaging and clinical outcome.
Materials and methods: Medical records of 26 consecutive patients with CCO who underwent CAS by a single operator using the same procedural protocol (with distal protection and closed-cell stents) were retrospectively evaluated. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores before and after CAS, periprocedural complications, and the restenosis rate were analyzed by independent stroke neurologists who were not involved in the care of the patients.
Results: The median mRS score for the 26 patients was 1 (range 0-5) before and after CAS. All of the patients underwent clinical and imaging follow-up (mean 19.5 ± 14.3 and 11.6 ± 11.2 months, respectively). Thirty-day mortality/permanent morbidity rates were 0 %. One patient had hyperperfusion syndrome and was managed medically without sequelae; however, he had stent occlusion after 30 days, resulting in a decline in his mRS from 4 (preprocedure) to 5. Otherwise, there was no decline in mRS during the post-discharge follow-up.
Conclusion: According to an independent analysis of this single-operator series, CAS is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with CCO.
Keywords: Carotid angioplasty; Carotid occlusion; Carotid stenting; Distal protection; Stroke.
Similar articles
-
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040. J Vasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16476606
-
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting.J Vasc Surg. 2014 Mar;59(3):749-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.055. Epub 2013 Dec 19. J Vasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24360588
-
Outcome of carotid artery stenting in the hands of vascular surgeons.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Aug;402(5):805-810. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1585-6. Epub 2017 May 30. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017. PMID: 28560568
-
Ultrasound surveillance after CAS and CEA: what's the evidence?J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014 Apr;55(2 Suppl 1):33-41. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014. PMID: 24796896 Review.
-
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022. Am J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18154764 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation between high perfusion syndrome and stent restenosis after stent implantation.Exp Ther Med. 2016 Dec;12(6):3675-3679. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3813. Epub 2016 Oct 18. Exp Ther Med. 2016. PMID: 28101162 Free PMC article.
-
The First Report on Strategic Management of Bilateral Carotid Artery Stenosis: Exploring Surgical Challenges and Decision-Making.Clin Case Rep. 2025 Aug 18;13(8):e70803. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70803. eCollection 2025 Aug. Clin Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 40838103 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources