Using the Consumer Experience with Pharmacy Services Survey as a quality metric for ambulatory care pharmacies: older adults' perspectives
- PMID: 27231004
- PMCID: PMC4885460
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011241
Using the Consumer Experience with Pharmacy Services Survey as a quality metric for ambulatory care pharmacies: older adults' perspectives
Abstract
Objectives: To describe older adults' perceptions of evaluating and comparing pharmacies based on the Consumer Experience with Pharmacy Services Survey (CEPSS), describe older adults' perceived importance of the CEPSS and its specific domains, and explore older adults' perceptions of the influence of specific CEPSS domains in choosing/switching pharmacies.
Design: Focus group methodology was combined with the administration of a questionnaire. The focus groups explored participants' perceived importance of the CEPSS and their perception of using the CEPSS to choose and/or switch pharmacies. Then, using the questionnaire, participants rated their perceived importance of each CEPSS domain in evaluating a pharmacy, and the likelihood of using CEPSS to switch pharmacies if their current pharmacy had low ratings. Descriptive and thematic analyses were done.
Setting: 6 semistructured focus groups were conducted in a private meeting room in a Mid-Western state in the USA.
Participants: 60 English-speaking adults who were at least 65 years, and had filled a prescription at a retail pharmacy within 90 days.
Results: During the focus groups, the older adults perceived the CEPSS to have advantages and disadvantages in evaluating and comparing pharmacies. Older adults thought the CEPSS was important in choosing the best pharmacies and avoiding the worst pharmacies. The perceived influence of the CEPSS in switching pharmacies varied depending on the older adult's personal experience or trust of other consumers' experience. Questionnaire results showed that participants perceived health/medication-focused communication as very important or extremely important (n=47, 82.5%) in evaluating pharmacies and would be extremely likely (n=21, 36.8%) to switch pharmacies if their pharmacy had low ratings in this domain.
Conclusions: The older adults in this study are interested in using patient experiences as a quality metric for avoiding the worst pharmacies. Pharmacists' communication about health and medicines is perceived important and likely to influence older adults' pharmacy selection.
Keywords: Older adults; Patient experience survey; Pharmacy; Quality in healthcare; Quality measures.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Figures


Similar articles
-
Patients' perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study.BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 19;5(1):e006086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006086. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 25600253 Free PMC article.
-
The structural and process aspects of pharmacy quality: older adults' perceptions.Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):96-106. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0211-3. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016. PMID: 26499502
-
Advancing the use of community pharmacy quality measures: a qualitative study.J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Jul-Aug;53(4):400-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12160. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013. PMID: 23892813
-
Consumer perceptions of community pharmacy-based promotion of mental health and well-being.Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Jan;32(1):26-31. doi: 10.1002/hpja.312. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Health Promot J Austr. 2021. PMID: 31821666 Review.
-
Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: practice and research in the US.Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jul-Aug;40(7-8):1400-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G545. Ann Pharmacother. 2006. PMID: 16868221 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient Experiences at Enhanced-Service Pharmacies in Iowa.Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 31;10(2):10.24926/iip.v10i2.1530. doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i2.1530. eCollection 2019. Innov Pharm. 2019. PMID: 34007554 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Faber M, Bosch M, Wollersheim H et al. . Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review. Med Care 2009;47:1–8. - PubMed
-
- James JA. Public Reporting on Quality and Costs Do Report Cards and Other Measures of Providers' Performance Lead to Improved Care and Better Choices by Consumers? Project HOPE: The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc. Publication: Health Affairs/RWJF Health Policy Briefs. http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2012/03/public-reporting-on-qual... (accessed 20 May 2016).
-
- Abraham J, Sick B, Anderson J et al. . Selecting a provider: what factors influence patients’ decision making? J Healthc Manag 2011;56:99. - PubMed
-
- Hibbard JH, Greene J, Daniel D. What is quality anyway? Performance reports that clearly communicate to consumers the meaning of quality of care. Med Care Res Rev 2010;67:275–93. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources