Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;93(8):987-96.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000892.

Optical Assessment of Soft Contact Lens Edge-Thickness

Affiliations

Optical Assessment of Soft Contact Lens Edge-Thickness

Patrice Tankam et al. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the edge shape of soft contact lenses using Gabor-Domain Optical Coherence Microscopy (GD-OCM) with a 2-μm imaging resolution in three dimensions and to generate edge-thickness profiles at different distances from the edge tip of soft contact lenses.

Methods: A high-speed custom-designed GD-OCM system was used to produce 3D images of the edge of an experimental soft contact lens (Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY) in four different configurations: in air, submerged into water, submerged into saline with contrast agent, and placed onto the cornea of a porcine eyeball. An algorithm to compute the edge-thickness was developed and applied to cross-sectional images. The proposed algorithm includes the accurate detection of the interfaces between the lens and the environment, and the correction of the refraction error.

Results: The sharply defined edge tip of a soft contact lens was visualized in 3D. Results showed precise thickness measurement of the contact lens edge profile. Fifty cross-sectional image frames for each configuration were used to test the robustness of the algorithm in evaluating the edge-thickness at any distance from the edge tip. The precision of the measurements was less than 0.2 μm.

Conclusions: The results confirmed the ability of GD-OCM to provide high-definition images of soft contact lens edges. As a nondestructive, precise, and fast metrology tool for soft contact lens measurement, the integration of GD-OCM in the design and manufacturing of contact lenses will be beneficial for further improvement in edge design and quality control. In the clinical perspective, the in vivo evaluation of the lens fitted onto the cornea will advance our understanding of how the edge interacts with the ocular surface. The latter will provide insights into the impact of long-term use of contact lenses on the visual performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gabor-Domain Optical Coherence Microscopy (GD-OCM) setup.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Detection of the contact lens boundaries. (A) Region of interest after segmenting the original image; (B) binary image of the detected peaks; (C) boundaries identification of the contact lens edge from polynomial fitting. Red solid line corresponds to the top surface of the CL and the blue solid line corresponds to the bottom surface of the CL. Yellow line shows the fluid gap.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Principle of the refraction effect. The difference between a GD-OCM data point and a real impact point is presented. The diagram helps derivation of the relationship between thicknesses and angles.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plot of the apparent thickness from GD-OCM for (A) four different tilted angles as a function of the refractive index of the sample, and (B) for three different indices of refraction as a function of the tilted angle.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Experimental validation of the refraction correction with three different tilting angles (A1) 0 degrees, (A2) 12 degrees and (A3) 17.5 degrees. (B) Comparison of the GD-OCM apparent thickness and the refraction corrected thickness.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Results of imaging and edge-thickness measurement of a soft contact lens (CL) using GD-OCM in three different configurations: (A) CL in air, (B) CL in plastic bag filled with water, (C) CL in plastic bag filled with saline and contrast agent, and (D) CL onto the cornea of a porcine eyeball.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Thickness profile as a function of the distance from the edge. The thickness profile was obtained from the average of 50 successive image frames for each configuration and was corrected for refraction.

References

    1. Nichols JJ. Annual report - contact lenses 2013. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2014;29:22–28.
    1. Rah MJ, Walline JJ, Jones-Jordan LA, Sinnott LT, Jackson JM, Manny RE, Coffey B, Lyons S. Vision specific quality of life of pediatric contact lens wearers. ACHIEVE Study Group. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87:560–6. - PubMed
    1. Craig JP, Willcox MD, Argueso P, Maissa C, Stahl U, Tomlinson A, Wang J, Yokoi N, Stapleton F. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the contact lens interactions with the tear film subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS123–56. - PubMed
    1. Efron N, Jones L, Bron AJ, Knop E, Arita R, Barabino S, McDermott AM, Villani E, Willcox MD, Markoulli M. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the contact lens interactions with the ocular surface and adnexa subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS98–TFOS122. - PubMed
    1. Nichols JJ, Willcox MD, Bron AJ, Belmonte C, Ciolino JB, Craig JP, Dogru M, Foulks GN, Jones L, Nelson JD, Nichols KK, Purslow C, Schaumberg DA, Stapleton F, Sullivan DA. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS7–TFOS13. - PMC - PubMed