Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 May 27;11(1):88.
doi: 10.1186/s13019-016-0484-1.

Single chest tube drainage is superior to double chest tube drainage after lobectomy: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Single chest tube drainage is superior to double chest tube drainage after lobectomy: a meta-analysis

Dong Zhou et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: In this meta-analysis, we conducted a pooled analysis of clinical studies comparing the efficacy of single chest tube versus double chest tube after a lobectomy.

Methods: According to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration, we established a rigorous study protocol. We performed a systematic electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases to identify articles to include in our meta-analysis. A literature search was performed using relevant keywords. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan© software.

Results: Five studies, published between 2003 and 2014, including 630 patients (314 patients with a single chest tube and 316 patients with a double chest tube), met the selection criteria. From the available data, the patients using a single tube demonstrated significantly decreased postoperative pain [weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.60; 95 % confidence intervals [CIs] -0.68-- 0.52; P < 0.00001], duration of drainage [WMD -0.70; 95 % CIs -0.90-- 0.49; P < 0.00001] and hospital stay [WMD -0.51; 95 % CIs -0.91-- 0.12; P = 0.01] compared to patients using a double tube after a pulmonary lobectomy. However, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications [OR 0.91; 95 % CIs 0.57-1.44; P = 0.67] and re-drainage rates [OR 0.81; 95 % CIs 0.42-1.58; P = 0.54].

Conclusion: Our results showed that a single-drain method is effective, reducing postoperative pain, hospitalization times and duration of drainage in patients who undergo a lobectomy. Moreover, the single-drain method does not increase the occurrence of postoperative complications and re-drainage rates.

Keywords: Chest tube; Complications; Drainage; Lobectomy; Pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the literature search according to the PRISMA statement
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot for postoperative pain
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot for duration of drainage
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot for length of hospital stay
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot for postoperative complications
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot for re-drainage rate

References

    1. Pearson FG, Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Hiebert CA, McKneally MF, Urschell HC. Thoracic surgery. New York, Edinburgh, London, Melbourne, Tokyo: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. pp. 981–90.
    1. Shields TW, LoCicero JR, Ponn RB. General thoracic surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 2000. pp. 433–57.
    1. Alex J, Ansari J, Bahalkar P, Agarwala S, Rehman MU, Saleh A, Cowen ME. Comparison of the immediate postoperative outcome of using the conventional two drains versus a single drain after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1046–9. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00884-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gomez-Caro A, Roca MJ, Torres J, Cascales P, Terol E, Castaner J, Pinero A, Parrilla P. Successful use of a single chest drain postlobectomy instead of two classical drains: a randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:562–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Okur E, Baysungur V, Tezel C, Sevilgen G, Ergene G, Gokce M, Halezeroglu S. Comparison of the single or double chest tube applications after pulmonary lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35:32–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources