Occupational Snake Bites: a Prospective Case Series of Patients Reported to the ToxIC North American Snakebite Registry
- PMID: 27234295
- PMCID: PMC5135670
- DOI: 10.1007/s13181-016-0555-7
Occupational Snake Bites: a Prospective Case Series of Patients Reported to the ToxIC North American Snakebite Registry
Abstract
Introduction: In the developing world, occupation has been identified as a risk factor for snake bite. Such an association has not been described in the USA. The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of occupational snake bite in patients reported to the ToxIC North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR).
Methods: This was a prospective case series of patients reported to the ToxIC NASBR between January 1, 2014 and November 5, 2015. Variables collected included snake species, patient demographics, date and location of exposure, occupation, bite location, clinical manifestations, and management.
Results: Of 180 adult snake bites reported, 25 (13.9 %; 95 % CI 9.2-19.8 %) were occupational in nature. Rattlesnake envenomations were common (80 %). Most snake bites (96 %) occurred in men. Occupations most associated with snake bite were landscaping (28 %) and working directly with snakes (24 %). Fifty-six percent of bites occurred in an outdoor work environment. Seventy-six percent of envenomations were to the upper extremities. Intentional interaction occurred in 40 % of cases, all of which sustained finger envenomations. No cases presented with apparent acute ethanol intoxication.
Conclusions: The majority of occupational snake bites occurred in men working outdoors and were unintentional injuries. Bites involving the upper extremity tended to result from intentional interactions. Acute ethanol intoxication did not appear to be involved with occupational envenomations.
Keywords: Envenomation; Occupation; Risk factor; Snake bite.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with Ethical Standards Conflicts of Interest Authors Meghan Spyres MD, Anne-Michelle Ruha MD, Steven Seifert MD, Nancy Onisko DO, Angela Padilla-Jones RN, and Eric Smith MSIS have no conflicts of interest to declare. Funding There was no direct funding for this project. BTG International sponsored an unrestricted grant to ACMT for the NASBR registry.
Figures
References
-
- O’Neil ME, Mack KA, Gilchrist J, Wozniak, EJ: Snakebite injuries treated in United States emergency departments, 2001–2004. Wilderness Environ Med, 2007 cited 2016 Mar 26;18:281–287. Available from Pubmed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18076294. - PubMed
-
- Lavonas EJ, Ruha AM, Banner W et al. Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results from an evidence-informed consensus workgroup. BMC Emerg Med, 2011[cited 2016 Mar 26];11:1–15. Available from Pubmed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21291549 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ruha A, Pizon AF. Native (US) venomous snakes and lizards. In: Hoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson LS, Goldfrank LR, editors. Goldfrank’s toxicologic emergencies, 10e. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015. pp. 1537–1546.
-
- Warrick BJ, Boyer LV, Seifert SA. Non-native (exotic) snake envenomations in the U.S.; 2005–2011. Toxins, 2014 [cited 2016 Mar 26];6:2899–2911. Available from Pubmed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25268980. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Downey DJ, Omer GE, Moneim, MS. New Mexico rattlesnake bites. Demographic review and guidelines for treatment. J Trauma,1991 [cited 2016 Mar 26];31:1380–1386. Available from Pubmed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1942147. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
