Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;61(6):774-90.
doi: 10.4187/respcare.04651.

Should A Tidal Volume of 6 mL/kg Be Used in All Patients?

Affiliations
Review

Should A Tidal Volume of 6 mL/kg Be Used in All Patients?

John D Davies et al. Respir Care. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

It has been shown that mechanical ventilation by itself can cause lung injury and affect outcomes. Ventilator-induced lung injury is associated with high tidal volumes in lungs afflicted with ARDS. However, the question is: Do high tidal volumes have this same effect in normal lungs or lungs that have respiratory compromise stemming from something other than ARDS? Many clinicians believe that a tidal volume strategy of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight should be standard practice in all patients receiving mechanical ventilation. There is a growing body of evidence related to this issue, and this is the debate that will be tackled in this paper from both pro and con perspectives.

Keywords: ARDS; hypercapnia; lung-protective ventilation; mechanical ventilation; predicted body weight; strain; stress; tidal volume; time constant.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources