Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the water swallow test for screening aspiration in stroke patients

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the water swallow test for screening aspirations in stroke patients.

Background: The water swallow test is a simple bedside screening tool for aspiration among stroke patients in nursing practice, but results from different studies have not been combined before.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to provide a synthetic and critical appraisal of the included studies.

Data sources: Electronic literature in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and other sources were searched systemically in this study. Databases and registers were searched from inception up to 30 April 2015.

Review methods: This systematic review was conducted using the recommendations from Cochrane Collaboration for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Bivariate random-effects models were used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy across those studies. The tool named Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the studies.

Results: There were 770 stroke patients in the 11 studies for the meta-analysis. The water swallow test had sensitivities between 64-79% and specificities between 61-81%. Meta-regression analysis indicated that increasing water volume resulted in higher sensitivity but lower specificity of the water swallow test.

Conclusions: This systematic review showed that the water swallow test was a useful screening tool for aspiration among stroke patients. The test accuracy was related to the water volume and a 3-oz water swallow test was recommended for aspiration screening in stroke patients.

Keywords: aspiration; nursing; stroke; systematic review and meta-analysis; water swallow test.