Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;38(2):284-296.
doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16

Johan Bjureberg  1 , Brjánn Ljótsson  1 , Matthew T Tull  2 , Erik Hedman  1 , Hanna Sahlin  1 , Lars-Gunnar Lundh  3 , Jonas Bjärehed  3 , David DiLillo  4 , Terri Messman-Moore  5 , Clara Hellner Gumpert  1 , Kim L Gratz  2
Affiliations

Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16

Johan Bjureberg et al. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a widely-used, theoretically-driven, and psychometrically-sound self-report measure of emotion regulation difficulties. However, at 36-items, the DERS may be challenging to administer in some situations or settings (e.g., in the course of patient care or large-scale epidemiological studies). Consequently, there is a need a briefer version of the DERS. The goal of the present studies was to develop and evaluate a 16-item version of the DERS - the DERS-16. The reliability and validity of the DERS-16 were examined in a clinical sample (N = 96) and two large community samples (Ns = 102 and 482). The validity of the DERS-16 was evaluated comparing the relative strength of the association of the two versions of the DERS with measures of emotion regulation and related constructs, psychopathology, and clinically-relevant behaviors theorized to stem from emotion regulation deficits. Results demonstrate that the DERS-16 has retained excellent internal consistency, good test-retest reliability, and good convergent and discriminant validity. Further, the DERS-16 showed minimal differences in its convergent and discriminant validity with relevant measures when compared to the original DERS. In conclusion, the DERS-16 offers a valid and brief method for the assessment of overall emotion regulation difficulties.

Keywords: assessment; emotion regulation; experiential avoidance; self-report measure; short version.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006;13:27–45. - PubMed
    1. Baer RA, Smith GT, Lykins E, Button D, Krietemeyer J, Sauer S, Walsh E, Duggan D, Williams JMG. Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment. 2008;15:329–342. - PubMed
    1. Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JA. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1994;38:33–40. - PubMed
    1. Bardeen JR, Fergus TA, Orcutt HK. An examination of the latent structure of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2012;34:382–392.
    1. Ben-Porath DD, Federici A, Wisniewski L, Warren M. Dialectical Behavior Therapy: Does it bring about improvements in affect regulation in individuals with eating disorders? Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. 2014;44:245–251.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources