Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;7(1):75-85.
doi: 10.4310/SII.2014.v7.n1.a9.

Approaches to retrospective sampling for longitudinal transition regression models

Affiliations

Approaches to retrospective sampling for longitudinal transition regression models

Sally Hunsberger et al. Stat Interface. 2014.

Abstract

For binary diseases that relapse and remit, it is often of interest to estimate the effect of covariates on the transition process between disease states over time. The transition process can be characterized by modeling the probability of the binary event given the individual's history. Designing studies that examine the impact of time varying covariates over time can lead to collection of extensive amounts of data. Sometimes it may be possible to collect and store tissue, blood or images and retrospectively analyze this covariate information. In this paper we consider efficient sampling designs that do not require biomarker measurements on all subjects. We describe appropriate estimation methods for transition probabilities and functions of these probabilities, and evaluate efficiency of the estimates from the proposed sampling designs. These new methods are illustrated with data from a longitudinal study of bacterial vaginosis, a common relapsing-remitting vaginal infection of women of child bearing age.

Keywords: Markov model; Survey sampling; Weighted maximum likelihood.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Contour plots of the ratio of the asymptotic variance estimates for the different sampling/estimation methods. The first column shows the ratio of the variance estimates for β0 for the three unbiased methods. The last two columns show the ratio of the variance estimates for β1 for the all methods.

Similar articles

References

    1. Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KCS, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. American Journal of Medicine. 1983;74:14–22. - PubMed
    1. Binder D. Taylor linearization for single phase and two phase samples: A cookbook approach. Survey Methodology. 1996:17–26.
    1. Cox DR, Snell EJ. Analysis of Binary Data. Chapman & Hall CRC; 1989. MR1014891.
    1. Demnati A, Rao JNK. Linearization variance estimators for survey data. Survey Methodology. 2004;30:4–13.
    1. Graubard BI, Rao RS, Gastwirth JL. Using the Peters-Belsen method to measure health care disparities from complex survey data. Statistics in Medicine. 2005;24:2659–2668. MR2196206. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources