How blockchain-timestamped protocols could improve the trustworthiness of medical science
- PMID: 27239273
- PMCID: PMC4866630
- DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8114.3
How blockchain-timestamped protocols could improve the trustworthiness of medical science
Retraction in
-
RETRACTION: How blockchain-timestamped protocols could improve the trustworthiness of medical science.F1000Res. 2017 Jun 8;6:805. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11888.1. eCollection 2017. F1000Res. 2017. PMID: 28649375 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Trust in scientific research is diminished by evidence that data are being manipulated. Outcome switching, data dredging and selective publication are some of the problems that undermine the integrity of published research. Methods for using blockchain to provide proof of pre-specified endpoints in clinical trial protocols were first reported by Carlisle. We wished to empirically test such an approach using a clinical trial protocol where outcome switching has previously been reported. Here we confirm the use of blockchain as a low cost, independently verifiable method to audit and confirm the reliability of scientific studies.
Keywords: bitcoin; blockchain; clinical trials; data.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
References
-
- House of Commons: Science and Technology Committee. Third Report.2016. Reference Source
-
- WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.2016. Reference Source - PubMed
-
- COMPare - Full results.2016. Reference Source
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
