Promoting development and uptake of health innovations: The Nose to Tail Tool
- PMID: 27239275
- PMCID: PMC4863676
- DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8145.1
Promoting development and uptake of health innovations: The Nose to Tail Tool
Abstract
Introduction Health sector management is increasingly complex as new health technologies, treatments, and innovative service delivery strategies are developed. Many of these innovations are implemented prematurely, or fail to be implemented at scale, resulting in substantial wasted resources. Methods A scoping review was conducted to identify articles that described the scale up process conceptually or that described an instance in which a healthcare innovation was scaled up. We define scale up as the expansion and extension of delivery or access to an innovation for all end users in a jurisdiction who will benefit from it. Results Sixty nine articles were eligible for review. Frequently described stages in the innovation process and contextual issues that influence progress through each stage were mapped. 16 stages were identified: 12 deliberation and 4 action stages. Included papers suggest that innovations progress through stages of maturity and the uptake of innovation depends on the innovation aligning with the interests of 3 critical stakeholder groups (innovators, end users and the decision makers) and is also influenced by 3 broader contexts (social and physical environment, the health system, and the regulatory, political and economic environment). The 16 stages form the rows of the Nose to Tail Tool (NTT) grid and the 6 contingency factors form columns. The resulting stage-by-issue grid consists of 72 cells, each populated with cell-specific questions, prompts and considerations from the reviewed literature. Conclusion We offer a tool that helps stakeholders identify the stage of maturity of their innovation, helps facilitate deliberative discussions on the key considerations for each major stakeholder group and the major contextual barriers that the innovation faces. We believe the NTT will help to identify potential problems that the innovation will face and facilitates early modification, before large investments are made in a potentially flawed solution.
Keywords: Health innovation; decision makers; end users; implementation; pilot test; researchers; scale up; stakeholders.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
-
How ownership rights over microorganisms affect infectious disease control and innovation: A root-cause analysis of barriers to data sharing as experienced by key stakeholders.PLoS One. 2018 May 2;13(5):e0195885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195885. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29718947 Free PMC article.
-
Differentiating innovation priorities among stakeholder in hospital care.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Aug 16;13:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-91. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013. PMID: 23947398 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing national implementation of innovations within community pharmacy: a systematic review applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 4;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0867-5. Implement Sci. 2019. PMID: 30832698 Free PMC article.
-
A modified stakeholder participation assessment framework for design thinking in health innovation.Healthc (Amst). 2018 Sep;6(3):191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 28. Healthc (Amst). 2018. PMID: 29960878 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving the Uptake of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Ontario.Cureus. 2021 Jul 13;13(7):e16364. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16364. eCollection 2021 Jul. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34395141 Free PMC article.
-
Risk-Stratified Pathways for Cancer Survivorship Care: Insights from a Deliberative Multi-Stakeholder Consultation.Curr Oncol. 2021 Sep 5;28(5):3408-3419. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050295. Curr Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34590587 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying and Overcoming Policy-Level Barriers to the Implementation of Digital Health Innovation: Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 20;21(12):e14994. doi: 10.2196/14994. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31859679 Free PMC article.
-
Translational health technology and system schemes: enhancing the dynamics of health informatics.Health Inf Sci Syst. 2020 Nov 9;8(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s13755-020-00133-5. eCollection 2020 Dec. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2020. PMID: 33194173 Free PMC article.
-
Institutionalizing Innovation: From Pilot to Scale for Co-Packaged Oral Rehydration Salts and Zinc-A Case Study in Zambia.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Feb 28;12(1):e2300286. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00286. Print 2024 Feb 28. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024. PMID: 38242636 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Institute of Health: Clinical and translational science.2014. Reference Source
-
- Edwards N: Scaling-up health innovations and interventions in public health: A brief review of the current state-of-the-science.2014;1–45. Reference Source
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials