Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:9098416.
doi: 10.1155/2016/9098416. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

Serological and Molecular Evidence of Q Fever in Domestic Ruminants in Bangladesh

Affiliations

Serological and Molecular Evidence of Q Fever in Domestic Ruminants in Bangladesh

Md Arifur Rahman et al. Vet Med Int. 2016.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to know the herd and animal level prevalence of Q fever in domestic ruminants in some selected districts in Bangladesh. Randomly collected 111 bulk milk and 94 sera samples of cattle, sheep, and goats were tested by indirect ELISA (iELISA). DNA extracted from 23 aborted fetal membranes was analyzed by real time (rt) PCR. The positive cut-off value of iELISA in bulk milk and individual animal sera was ≥30% and ≥40%, respectively. The overall herd level prevalence of Q fever in dairy cattle was 15.6%. The prevalence of Q fever in dairy cattle was significantly higher in Sirajganj in comparison to Satkhira District (P < 0.01). The overall seroprevalence of Q fever in domestic ruminants was 5.06%. Although statistically insignificant, the seroprevalence of Q fever was relatively higher in sheep (9.52%) in comparison to goats (3.33%) and cattle (3.57%). Out of 23 aborted fetal membranes, only one sheep placenta was positive in rt PCR. Q fever is present in all of the three important species of domestic ruminants in Bangladesh. It may have some role in sheep abortion as the seroprevalence is relatively higher and also one sheep placenta is rt PCR positive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maurin M., Raoult D. Q fever. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1999;12(4):518–553. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angelakis E., Raoult D. Q fever. Veterinary Microbiology. 2010;140(3-4):297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.07.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babudieri B. Q fever: a zoonosis. Advances in Veterinary Science. 1959;5:81–182.
    1. Porter S. R., Czaplicki G., Mainil J., Guattéo R., Saegerman C. Q fever: current state of knowledge and perspectives of research of a neglected zoonosis. International Journal of Microbiology. 2011;2011:22. doi: 10.1155/2011/248418.248418 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. To H., Htwe K. K., Kako N., et al. Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii infection in dairy cattle with reproductive disorders. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 1998;60(7):859–861. doi: 10.1292/jvms.60.859. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources