Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;8(1):113-121.
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12095. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Malnutrition and sarcopenia predict post-liver transplantation outcomes independently of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score

Affiliations

Malnutrition and sarcopenia predict post-liver transplantation outcomes independently of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score

Maria Kalafateli et al. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Although malnutrition and sarcopenia are prevalent in cirrhosis, their impact on outcomes following liver transplantation is not well documented.

Methods: The associations of nutritional status and sarcopenia with post-transplant infections, requirement for mechanical ventilation, intensive care (ICU) and hospital stay, and 1 year mortality were assessed in 232 consecutive transplant recipients. Nutritional status and sarcopenia were assessed using the Royal Free Hospital-Global Assessment (RFH-GA) tool and the L3-psoas muscle index (L3-PMI) on CT, respectively.

Results: A wide range of RFH-SGA and L3-PMI were observed within similar Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) sub-categories. Malnutrition and sarcopenia were independent predictors of all outcomes. Post-transplant infections were associated with MELD (OR = 1.055, 95%CI = 1.002-1.11) and severe malnutrition (OR = 6.55, 95%CI = 1.99-21.5); ventilation > 24 h with MELD (OR = 1.1, 95%CI = 1.036-1.168), severe malnutrition (OR = 8.5, 95%CI = 1.48-48.87) and suboptimal donor liver (OR = 2.326, 95%CI = 1.056-5.12); ICU stay > 5 days, with age (OR = 1.054, 95%CI = 1.004-1.106), MELD (OR = 1.137, 95%CI = 1.057-1.223) and severe malnutrition (OR = 7.46, 95%CI = 1.57-35.43); hospital stay > 20 days with male sex (OR = 2.107, 95%CI = 1.004-4.419) and L3-PMI (OR = 0.996, 95%CI = 0.994-0.999); 1 year mortality with L3-PMI (OR = 0.996, 95%CI = 0.992-0.999). Patients at the lowest L3-PMI receiving suboptimal grafts had longer ICU/hospital stay and higher incidence of infections.

Conclusions: Malnutrition and sarcopenia are associated with early post-liver transplant morbidity/mortality. Allocation indices do not include nutritional status and may jeopardize outcomes in nutritionally compromised individuals.

Keywords: Cirrhosis; Morbidity; Mortality; Nutritional assessment; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plots of L3‐psoas muscle index (L3‐PMI) for male and female patients stratified according to Royal Free Hospital‐Global Assessment (RFH‐GA). Males well‐nourished: median PMI = 492.7 (range 224.2–856.1), mild/moderately malnourished: median PMI = 399.05.4 (187.3–648.7), severely malnourished: median PMI = 313.5 (195.8–454.9). Females well‐nourished: median PMI = 388.8 (range 210.4–763.8), mild/moderately malnourished: median PMI = 309.4 (78.9–589.9), severely malnourished: median PMI = 317.65 (215.8–508.1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box‐plots of L3‐psoas muscle index (L3‐PMI) for male and female patients stratified according to Model for End‐stage Liver Disease (MELD). Males: median L3‐PMI levels were 486.6 (range 200.8–856.1), 417.6 (178.9–817.3), 415.15 (236.7–806.2), 335.6 (187.3–536.2), and 483.2 (162.5–983) mm2/m2 for MELD score ≤10, 11–15, 16–20, 21–25, and >25, respectively. Females: median L3‐PMI levels were 370.5 (range 78.9–554.6), 330.75 (135.4–589.9), 368.3 (150.5–763.8), 308 (205.4–392.3), and 359.9 (215.8–394.9) mm2/m2 for MELD score ≤10, 11–15, 16–20, 21–25, and >25, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nutritional status of the transplant recipients assessed by Royal Free Hospital‐Global Assessment (RFH‐GA) stratified according to Model for End‐stage Liver Disease (MELD) score.

References

    1. Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J, Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet 2014;383:1749–1761. - PubMed
    1. Cabre E, Gassull MA. Nutrition in liver disease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2005;8:545–551. - PubMed
    1. Cheung K, Lee SS, Raman M. Prevalence and mechanisms of malnutrition in patients with advanced liver disease, and nutrition management strategies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 2012;10:117–125. - PubMed
    1. Muscaritoli M, Anker SD, Argiles J, Aversa Z, Bauer JM, Biolo G, et al Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre‐cachexia: joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) “cachexia–anorexia in chronic wasting diseases” and “nutrition in geriatrics”. Clin Nutr 2010;29:154–159. - PubMed
    1. Carvalho L, Parise ER. Evaluation of nutritional status of nonhospitalized patients with liver cirrhosis. Arq Gastroenterol 2006;43:269–274. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources