Scientific and ethical features of English-language online tests for Alzheimer's disease
- PMID: 27239511
- PMCID: PMC4877927
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.03.004
Scientific and ethical features of English-language online tests for Alzheimer's disease
Abstract
Introduction: Freely accessible online tests for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are widely available. The objective of this study was to evaluate these tests along three dimensions as follows: (1) scientific validity; (2) human-computer interaction (HCI) features; and (3) ethics features.
Methods: A sample of 16 online tests was identified through a keyword search. A rating grid for the tests was developed, and all tests were evaluated by two expert panels.
Results: Expert analysis revealed that (1) the validity of freely accessible online tests for AD is insufficient to provide useful diagnostic information; (2) HCI features of the tests are adequate for target users, and (3) the tests do not adhere to accepted ethical norms for medical interventions.
Discussion: The most urgent concerns raised center on the ethics of collecting and evaluating responses from users. Physicians and other professionals will benefit from a heightened awareness of these tools and their limitations today.
Keywords: Aging; Alzheimer's disease; Diagnosis; Ethics; Online health; Online tests; Self-assessment.
Figures
References
-
- Fox S. 2013. Health Online 2013. Pew Res Cent Internet Am Life Proj.http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/ Available at: Accessed August 19, 2014.
-
- Zickuhr K. 2012. Older adults and internet use. Pew Res Cent Internet Am Life Proj.http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/06/06/older-adults-and-internet-use/ Available at: Accessed August 19, 2014.
-
- Mead N., Varnam R., Rogers A., Roland M. What predicts patients' interest in the Internet as a health resource in primary care in England? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8:33–39. - PubMed
-
- Corner L., Bond J. Being at risk of dementia: Fears and anxieties of older adults. J Aging Stud. 2004;18:143–155.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials