Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 12;27(3-4):70-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2015.12.001. eCollection 2015 Sep-Dec.

Early phacoemulsification in patients with acute primary angle closure

Affiliations

Early phacoemulsification in patients with acute primary angle closure

Sasan Moghimi et al. J Curr Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare long term efficacy of phacoemulsification in the early management of acute primary angle closure (APAC) after aborting an acute attack and performing laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI).

Methods: In this nonrandomized comparative prospective study, we included 35 subjects presenting with APAC who had responded to medical treatment and LPI with intraocular pressure (IOP) less than 25 mmHg. Twenty patients with visually significant cataract with visual acuity of <20/30 were assigned to the "Phaco/LPI" group and underwent phacoemulsification within 6 weeks of the attack. Fifteen subjects with clear lens were assigned to the "LPI Only" group and were followed clinically. The primary measured outcome was the prevalence of IOP rise after 1 month (treatment failure), defined as 1) if a patient developed IOP rise resulting in IOP >21 mmHg with or without medication, or 2) if a patient required any medication to have IOP ≤21 mmHg after 1 month. Patients were followed for at least one year.

Result: IOP, number of medications, gonioscopy grading, and amount of synechiae were not significantly different at baseline between the two groups. Acute attack did not recur in any patient. There was more significant failure in the LPI Only group compared with the Phaco/LPI group (40% vs. 5%; p = 0.02). There was a significant difference in final IOP between the two study groups (13.90 ± 2.17 vs. 17.8 ± 4.16 in the Phaco/LPI and LPI Only groups, respectively; p = 0.001). Patients in the Phaco-LPI group needed less medication than the other group at final follow-up. No serious complications have arisen from the immediate LPI or phacoemulsification.

Conclusion: Phacoemulsification is a safe procedure for preventing IOP rise after aborting acute primary angle closure if performed within a few weeks of the attack.

Keywords: Acute primary angle closure; Gonioscopy; Intraocular pressure; Phacoemulsification; Synechiae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flow from presentation to study exit. IOP = intraocular pressure (mmHg).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Line chart of intraocular pressure (IOP) over time. Although the IOP was not significantly different between the two groups, Phaco/Laser peripheral iridotomy (Phaco/LPI) group has significantly lower IOP than LPI Only group during follow-up.

References

    1. Quigley H.A., Broman A.T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. David R., Tessler Z., Yassur Y. Long-term outcome of primary acute angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69:261–262. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aung T., Ang L.P., Chan S.-P., Chew P.T. Acute primary angle-closure: long-term intraocular pressure outcome in Asian eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:7–12. - PubMed
    1. Buckley S., Reeves B., Burdon M. Acute angle closure glaucoma: relative failure of YAG iridotomy in affected eyes and factors influencing outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:529–533. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai J.S., Tham C.C., Chua J.K., Poon A.S., Lam D.S. Laser peripheral iridoplasty as initial treatment of acute attack of primary angle-closure: a long-term follow-up study. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:484–487. - PubMed