On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations
- PMID: 27241618
- PMCID: PMC4886411
- DOI: 10.1186/s40359-016-0126-3
On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations
Abstract
Background: Meta-analyses play an important role in cumulative science by combining information across multiple studies and attempting to provide effect size estimates corrected for publication bias. Research on the reproducibility of meta-analyses reveals that errors are common, and the percentage of effect size calculations that cannot be reproduced is much higher than is desirable. Furthermore, the flexibility in inclusion criteria when performing a meta-analysis, combined with the many conflicting conclusions drawn by meta-analyses of the same set of studies performed by different researchers, has led some people to doubt whether meta-analyses can provide objective conclusions.
Discussion: The present article highlights the need to improve the reproducibility of meta-analyses to facilitate the identification of errors, allow researchers to examine the impact of subjective choices such as inclusion criteria, and update the meta-analysis after several years. Reproducibility can be improved by applying standardized reporting guidelines and sharing all meta-analytic data underlying the meta-analysis, including quotes from articles to specify how effect sizes were calculated. Pre-registration of the research protocol (which can be peer-reviewed using novel 'registered report' formats) can be used to distinguish a-priori analysis plans from data-driven choices, and reduce the amount of criticism after the results are known. The recommendations put forward in this article aim to improve the reproducibility of meta-analyses. In addition, they have the benefit of "future-proofing" meta-analyses by allowing the shared data to be re-analyzed as new theoretical viewpoints emerge or as novel statistical techniques are developed. Adoption of these practices will lead to increased credibility of meta-analytic conclusions, and facilitate cumulative scientific knowledge.
Keywords: Meta-analysis; Open science; Reporting guidelines; Reproducibility.
Similar articles
-
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.BMC Biol. 2023 Apr 3;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y. BMC Biol. 2023. PMID: 37013585 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology.PLoS One. 2020 May 27;15(5):e0233107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233107. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32459806 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Apr;4(4):423-434. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0787-z. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Nat Hum Behav. 2020. PMID: 31873200
-
Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):1018-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001452. Anesth Analg. 2016. PMID: 27537925 Review.
-
Verification report: A critical reanalysis of Vahey et al. (2015) "A meta-analysis of criterion effects for the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) in the clinical domain".J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;87:102015. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2024.102015. Epub 2025 Jan 15. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 39837724 Review.
Cited by
-
Null and Void? Errors in Meta-analysis on Perceptual Disfluency and Recommendations to Improve Meta-analytical Reproducibility.Educ Psychol Rev. 2021;33(3):1221-1247. doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09579-1. Epub 2021 Feb 3. Educ Psychol Rev. 2021. PMID: 33551625 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding Variation in Estimates of Diversionary Effects of Community College Entrance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sociol Educ. 2019 Jul;92(3):247-268. doi: 10.1177/0038040719848445. Epub 2019 May 12. Sociol Educ. 2019. PMID: 38415068 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducible research into human chemical communication by cues and pheromones: learning from psychology's renaissance.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190262. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0262. Epub 2020 Apr 20. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32306877 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000-2020).Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):334-349. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01644-z. Epub 2021 Jun 26. Behav Res Methods. 2022. PMID: 34173943 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neglect of publication bias compromises meta-analyses of educational research.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252415. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34081730 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Psychological Association . Publication manual of the American psychological association. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2009.
-
- Bem D, Tressoldi PE, Rabeyron T, Duggan M. Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events. 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2423692 Accessed 11 Apr 2014. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: Sage; 2011.
-
- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2009.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources