Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;99(11):1772-1777.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 May 17.

Patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening pre- and post-guidelines: Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)

Affiliations

Patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening pre- and post-guidelines: Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)

Lisa Carter-Harris et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: In 2013, the USPSTF issued a Grade B recommendation that long-term current and former smokers receive lung cancer screening. Shared decision-making is important for individuals considering screening, and patient-provider discussions an essential component of the process. We examined prevalence and predictors of lung cancer screening discussions pre- and post-USPSTF guidelines.

Methods: Data were obtained from two cycles of the Health Information National Trends Survey (2012; 2014). The analyzed sample comprised screening-eligible current and former smokers with no personal history of lung cancer (n=746 in 2012; n=795 in 2014). Descriptive and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted; patient-reported discussion about lung cancer screening with provider was the outcome of interest.

Results: Contrary to expectations, patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening were more prevalent pre-guideline, but overall patient-provider discussions were low in both years (17% in 2012; 10% in 2014). Current smokers were more likely to have had a discussion than former smokers. Significant predictors of patient-provider discussions included family history of cancer and having healthcare coverage.

Conclusions: The prevalence of patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening is suboptimal.

Practice implications: There is a critical need for patient and provider education about shared decision-making and its importance in cancer screening decisions.

Keywords: HINTS; Health Information National Trends Survey; Health communication; Lung cancer screening; Patient-provider discussion; Shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

of Potential Conflicts of Interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of analyzed samples in 2012 and 2014

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. Atlanta, GA:
    1. Wender R, Fontham ET, Barrera E, Jr, et al. American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:107–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:330–8. - PubMed
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) [Accessibility verified January 8 2016]; Available at https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo....

Publication types