Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May 12:10:209.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00209. eCollection 2016.

Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users

Francesca Cordella  1 , Anna Lisa Ciancio  1 , Rinaldo Sacchetti  2 , Angelo Davalli  2 , Andrea Giovanni Cutti  2 , Eugenio Guglielmelli  1 , Loredana Zollo  1
Affiliations
Review

Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users

Francesca Cordella et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

The loss of one hand can significantly affect the level of autonomy and the capability of performing daily living, working and social activities. The current prosthetic solutions contribute in a poor way to overcome these problems due to limitations in the interfaces adopted for controlling the prosthesis and to the lack of force or tactile feedback, thus limiting hand grasp capabilities. This paper presents a literature review on needs analysis of upper limb prosthesis users, and points out the main critical aspects of the current prosthetic solutions, in terms of users satisfaction and activities of daily living they would like to perform with the prosthetic device. The ultimate goal is to provide design inputs in the prosthetic field and, contemporary, increase user satisfaction rates and reduce device abandonment. A list of requirements for upper limb prostheses is proposed, grounded on the performed analysis on user needs. It wants to (i) provide guidelines for improving the level of acceptability and usefulness of the prosthesis, by accounting for hand functional and technical aspects; (ii) propose a control architecture of PNS-based prosthetic systems able to satisfy the analyzed user wishes; (iii) provide hints for improving the quality of the methods (e.g., questionnaires) adopted for understanding the user satisfaction with their prostheses.

Keywords: PNS-based prosthesis; grasping; patient needs; prosthesis requirements; upper limb prosthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Levels of upper limb absence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Statistics on level of upper limb absence in Italy and United Kingdom.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Most advanced commercially available prosthetic hands.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flowchart of the search and inclusion process.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Block scheme of the PNS-based control of a prosthetic system.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Antfolk C., D'Alonzo M., Rosen B., Lundborg G., Sebelius F., Cipriani C. (2013). Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 10, 45–54. 10.1586/erd.12.68 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atkins D. J., Heard D. C. Y., Donovan W. H. (1996). Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper limb loss and their reported research priorities. J. Prosthet. Orthot. 8, 2–11. 10.1097/00008526-199600810-00003 - DOI
    1. Atzori M., Muller H. (2015). Control capabilities of myoelectric robotic prostheses by hand amputees: a scientific research and market overview. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9:162. 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00162 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belter J. T., Segil J. L., Dollar A. M., Weir R. F. (2013). Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 50, 599–618. 10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0188 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biddiss E. A., Chau T. T. (2007). Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 31, 236–257. 10.1080/03093640600994581 - DOI - PubMed