Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 9:7:566.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00566. eCollection 2016.

Psychometric Properties of the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale in a Sample of Adolescents and Adults

Francesca M Bosco  1 , Ilaria Gabbatore  2 , Maurizio Tirassa  3 , Silvia Testa  3
Affiliations

Psychometric Properties of the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale in a Sample of Adolescents and Adults

Francesca M Bosco et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This research aimed at the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale (Th.o.m.a.s.). Th.o.m.a.s. is a semi-structured interview meant to evaluate a person's Theory of Mind (ToM). It is composed of several questions organized in four scales, each focusing on one of the areas of knowledge in which such faculty may manifest itself: Scale A (I-Me) investigates first-order first-person ToM; Scale B (Other-Self) investigates third-person ToM from an allocentric perspective; Scale C (I-Other) again investigates third-person ToM, but from an egocentric perspective; and Scale D (Other-Me) investigates second-order ToM. The psychometric proprieties of Th.o.m.a.s. were evaluated in a sample of 156 healthy persons: 80 preadolescent and adolescent (aged 11-17 years, 42 females) and 76 adults (aged from 20 to 67 years, 35 females). Th.o.m.a.s. scores show good inter-rater agreement and internal consistency; the scores increase with age. Evidence of criterion validity was found as Scale B scores were correlated with those of an independent instrument for the evaluation of ToM, the Strange Stories task. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed good fit of the four-factors theoretical model to the data, although the four factors were highly correlated. For each of the four scales, Rasch analyses showed that, with few exceptions, items fitted the Partial credit model and their functioning was invariant for gender and age. The results of this study, along with those of previous researches with clinical samples, show that Th.o.m.a.s. is a promising instrument to assess ToM in different populations.

Keywords: Th.o.m.a.s.; Theory of Mind; metacognition; social cognition; validation of ToM tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standardized solution of the four-factors CFA model of Th.o.m.a.s. (N = 154).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Baron-Cohen S., Leslie A. M., Frith U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21, 37–46. 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baron-Cohen S., O'Riordan M., Stone V., Jones R., Plaisted K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 29, 407–418. - PubMed
    1. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Spong A., Scahill V., Lawson J. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome. J. Dev. Learn. Disord. 5, 47–78.
    1. Beaumont R. B., Sofronoff K. (2008). A new computerized advanced theory of mind measure for children with Asperger syndrome: the ATOMIC. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 38, 249–260. 10.1007/s10803-007-0384-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bewick V., Cheek L., Ball J. (2003). Statistics review 7: correlation and regression. Crit. Care 7, 451–459. 10.1186/cc2401 - DOI - PMC - PubMed