Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 23:7:576.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00576. eCollection 2016.

Only Behavioral But Not Self-Report Measures of Speech Perception Correlate with Cognitive Abilities

Affiliations

Only Behavioral But Not Self-Report Measures of Speech Perception Correlate with Cognitive Abilities

Antje Heinrich et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Good speech perception and communication skills in everyday life are crucial for participation and well-being, and are therefore an overarching aim of auditory rehabilitation. Both behavioral and self-report measures can be used to assess these skills. However, correlations between behavioral and self-report speech perception measures are often low. One possible explanation is that there is a mismatch between the specific situations used in the assessment of these skills in each method, and a more careful matching across situations might improve consistency of results. The role that cognition plays in specific speech situations may also be important for understanding communication, as speech perception tests vary in their cognitive demands. In this study, the role of executive function, working memory (WM) and attention in behavioral and self-report measures of speech perception was investigated. Thirty existing hearing aid users with mild-to-moderate hearing loss aged between 50 and 74 years completed a behavioral test battery with speech perception tests ranging from phoneme discrimination in modulated noise (easy) to words in multi-talker babble (medium) and keyword perception in a carrier sentence against a distractor voice (difficult). In addition, a self-report measure of aided communication, residual disability from the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, was obtained. Correlations between speech perception tests and self-report measures were higher when specific speech situations across both were matched. Cognition correlated with behavioral speech perception test results but not with self-report. Only the most difficult speech perception test, keyword perception in a carrier sentence with a competing distractor voice, engaged executive functions in addition to WM. In conclusion, any relationship between behavioral and self-report speech perception is not mediated by a shared correlation with cognition.

Keywords: cognition; communication; hearing aid users; mild-to-moderate hearing loss; self-report; speech perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A schematic of the Diamond (2013) model of executive function. Also shown are how the study’s cognitive tasks relate to model components. A brief description of the tasks is given in the text, a more detailed description is provided in the method section. LNS, Letter Number Sequencing; SICspan Size, Size Comparison span, span size; Digits, five digit encoding and recall; TEA6/7, Test of Everyday Attention subtests 6 and 7; IMAP, IHR Multicentre study of Auditory Processing test; SICspan Intrusions, Size Comparison span, number of intrusions.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Means (and 95% confidence interval) for single word perception (triangle) and digit memory (circle) in the same dual task. Individual data are displayed as faint gray circles.

References

    1. Akeroyd M. A. (2008). Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. Int. J. Audiol. 47 S53–S71. 10.1080/14992020802301142 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arbogast T. L., Mason C. R., Kidd G., Jr. (2002). The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 2086–2098. 10.1121/1.1510141 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arehart K. H., Souza P., Baca R., Kates J. M. (2013). Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion. Ear Hear. 34 251–260. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318271aa5e - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 417–423. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A. D., Hitch G. (1974). “Working memory,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, ed. Bower G. H. (New York, NY: Academic Press; ), 47–89.

LinkOut - more resources