Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May 9:7:483.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00483. eCollection 2016.

Applications of 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) in Plant Imaging: Past, Present, and Future

Affiliations
Review

Applications of 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) in Plant Imaging: Past, Present, and Future

Amol Fatangare et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

The aim of this review article is to explore and establish the current status of 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) applications in plant imaging. In the present article, we review the previous literature on its experimental merits to formulate a consistent and inclusive picture of FDG applications in plant-imaging research. 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose is a [(18)F]fluorine-labeled glucose analog in which C-2 hydroxyl group has been replaced by a positron-emitting [(18)F] radioisotope. As FDG is a positron-emitting radiotracer, it could be used in in vivo imaging studies. FDG mimics glucose chemically and structurally. Its uptake and distribution are found to be similar to those of glucose in animal models. FDG is commonly used as a radiotracer for glucose in medical diagnostics and in vivo animal imaging studies but rarely in plant imaging. Tsuji et al. (2002) first reported FDG uptake and distribution in tomato plants. Later, Hattori et al. (2008) described FDG translocation in intact sorghum plants and suggested that it could be used as a tracer for photoassimilate translocation in plants. These findings raised interest among other plant scientists, which has resulted in a recent surge of articles involving the use of FDG as a tracer in plants. There have been seven studies describing FDG-imaging applications in plants. These studies describe FDG applications ranging from monitoring radiotracer translocation to analyzing solute transport, root uptake, photoassimilate tracing, carbon allocation, and glycoside biosynthesis. Fatangare et al. (2015) recently characterized FDG metabolism in plants; such knowledge is crucial to understanding and validating the application of FDG in plant imaging research. Recent FDG studies significantly advance our understanding of FDG translocation and metabolism in plants but also raise new questions. Here, we take a look at all the previous results to form a comprehensive picture of FDG translocation, metabolism, and applications in plants. In conclusion, we summarize current knowledge, discuss possible implications and limitations of previous studies, point to open questions in the field, and comment on the outlook for FDG applications in plant imaging.

Keywords: 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose; F-sucrose; FDG metabolism; PET; carbon allocation; in vivo imaging; photoassimilate translocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (18FDG/FDG).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Radiotracer uptake method. FDG is supplied to the plant through cut petiole (a), pricked leaf (b), or root (c). In the first method, FDG solution is applied to the cut petiole. In the second method, the mature leaf is cut, pricked or scratched at the distal end, and FDG solution is applied to the wounded region. In the third method, FDG solution is added to an aqueous solution in which roots are placed.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Schematics of the potential route of FDG uptake and metabolism in plant cells. FDG, 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose; FDG-6-P, FDG-6-phosphate; FDG-1-P, FDG-1-phosphate; UDP, Uridine-diphosphate; F-maltose, 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-maltose; Glu, glucose; DPE2, Arabidopsis disproportionating enzyme 2 (modified from Fatangare et al., 2015).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alavi A., Reivich M., Jones S. C., Greenberg J. H., Wolf A. P. (1982). “Functional imaging of the brain with positron emission tomography,” in Nuclear Medicine Annual 1982, eds Freeman L. M., Weissmann H. S. (New York, NY: Raven Press; ), 319–372.
    1. Alexoff D. L., Dewey S. L., Vaska P., Krishnamoorthy S., Ferrieri R., Schueller M., et al. (2011). PET imaging of thin objects: measuring the effects of positron range and partial-volume averaging in the leaf of Nicotiana tabacum. Nucl. Med. Biol. 38 191–200. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.08.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avril N. (2004). GLUT1 expression in tissue and 18F-FDG uptake. J. Nucl. Med. 45 930–932. - PubMed
    1. Barrio J. R., Huang S. C., Melega W. P., Yu D. C., Hoffman J. M., Schneider J. S., et al. (1990). 6-[18F] Fluoro-L-DOPA probes dopamine turnover rates in central dopaminergic structures. J. Neurosci. Res 27 487–493. 10.1002/jnr.490270408 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bessell E. M., Foster A. B., Westwood J. H. (1972). The use of deoxyfluoro-D-glucopyranoses and related compounds in a study of yeast hexokinase specificity. Biochem. J. 128 199 10.1042/bj1280199 - DOI - PMC - PubMed