Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 9:3:19.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2016.00019. eCollection 2016.

Quantitative Evaluation of Therapeutic Response by FDG-PET-CT in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Quantitative Evaluation of Therapeutic Response by FDG-PET-CT in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Dorothée Goulon et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the therapeutic response for metastatic breast cancer with (18)F-FDG position emission tomography (PET), this retrospective study aims to compare the performance of six different metabolic metrics with PERCIST, PERCIST with optimal thresholds, and an image-based parametric approach.

Methods: Thirty-six metastatic breast cancer patients underwent 128 PET scans and 123 lesions were identified. In a per-lesion and per-patient analysis, the performance of six metrics: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVpeak, standardized added metabolic activity (SAM), SUVmean, metabolic volume (MV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and a parametric approach (SULTAN) were determined and compared to the gold standard (defined by clinical assessment and biological and conventional imaging according RECIST 1.1). The evaluation was performed using PERCIST thresholds (for per-patient analysis only) and optimal thresholds (determined by the Youden criterion from the receiver operating characteristic curves).

Results: In the per-lesion analysis, 210 pairs of lesion evolutions were studied. Using the optimal thresholds, SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, SAM, and TLG were significantly correlated with the gold standard. SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmean reached the best sensitivity (91, 88, and 83%, respectively), specificity (93, 95, and 97%, respectively), and negative predictive value (NPV, 90, 88, and 83%, respectively). For the per--patient analysis, 79 pairs of PET were studied. The optimal thresholds compared to the PERCIST threshold did not improve performance for SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmean. Only SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, and TLG were correlated with the gold standard. SULTAN also performed equally: 83% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and NPV 86%.

Conclusion: This study showed that SUVmax and SUVpeak were the best parameters for PET evaluation of metastatic breast cancer lesions. Parametric imaging is helpful in evaluating serial studies.

Keywords: FDG; PERCIST; PET; SULTAN; breast cancer; parametric analysis; therapeutic evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curves of metabolic indices for per-lesion analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Synthetic scheme of the results of the intercomparison per-lesion study. Indices lying in the same circle were not significantly different.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves of metabolic indices for per-patient analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Synthetic scheme of the results of the intercomparison per-patient study. Indices lying in the same circle were not significantly different.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of metabolic assessment in a patient with metastatic bone evolution. (A) First examination: initial evaluation with multiple bone lesions (SUVmax = 11.8; SUVpeak = 7.1); (B) second examination: partial metabolic response on bone (SUVmax = 3.4 or 71% decrease; SUVpeak = 1.5 or 78% decrease); and (C) third examination: disease progression with new lesions and recurrence of some initial hypermetabolic lesions (SUVmax = 6.4 or 46% increase; SUVpeak = 4.3 or 65% increase). Persistence of sclerosis on all CT images does not allow to evaluate the response.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Example of non-responder patient classified by SULTAN. First PET showed right hilar hypermetabolism, and second PET performed in therapeutic monitoring (exam 2) showed a progression with persistence of right hilar hypermetabolism and the appearance of a hypermetabolic right lung uptake. The evolution was classified as non-responder. Factorial image obtained by SULTAN was superimposed on the CT-scan 1 (B). Associated curves (C) represented the growing trend (red) or stable (blue) voxels. The developments described by factor analysis were similar to those of SUVmax (D) with a stability of hilar fixation and the appearance of a right pulmonary uptake.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Example of responder patient classified by SULTAN. First PET showed right axillary lymph nodes hypermetabolism and the second PET, performed during therapeutic monitoring (review 2), showed a disappearance of the right axillary hypermetabolism. Factorial image obtained by SULTAN was superimposed on the CT-scan 1 (B). Associated curves (C) represented the downward trend (green) or stable (blue) voxels. The developments described by factor analysis were similar to those of SUVmax (D) with a loss of the right axillary uptake.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Luporsi E. Le cancer du sein métastatique. Définitions actuelles, épidémiologie, présentations cliniques. Springer; (2007). Available from: http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/bitstream/handle/2042/15908/1/SFSPM_20...
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (2009) 45:228–47.10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med (2009) 50(Suppl 1):122S–50S.10.2967/jnumed.108.057307 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carlier T, Bailly C. State-of-the-art and recent advances in quantification for therapeutic follow-up in oncology using PET. Front Med (2015) 2:18.10.3389/fmed.2015.00018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cachin F, Kelly A, Maublant J. Evaluation of the therapeutic response: role of isotopic imaging. Bull Cancer (2006) 93:1191–9.10.1684/bdc.2006.0145 - DOI - PubMed