Cross-habitat effects shape the ecosystem consequences of co-invasion by a pelagic and a benthic consumer
- PMID: 27245344
- DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3663-9
Cross-habitat effects shape the ecosystem consequences of co-invasion by a pelagic and a benthic consumer
Abstract
Invasive species can have major impacts on ecosystems, yet little work has addressed the combined effects of multiple invaders that exploit different habitats. Two common invaders in aquatic systems are pelagic fishes and crayfishes. Pelagic-oriented fish effects are typically strong on the pelagic food web, whereas crayfish effects are strong on the benthic food web. Thus, co-invasion may generate strong ecological responses in both habitats. We tested the effects of co-invasion on experimental pond ecosystems using two widespread invasive species, one pelagic (western mosquitofish) and one benthic (red swamp crayfish). As expected, mosquitofish had strong effects on the pelagic food web, reducing the abundance of Daphnia and causing a strong trophic cascade (increase in phytoplankton). Crayfish had strong effects on the benthic food web, reducing the abundance of benthic filamentous algae. Yet, we also found evidence for important cross-habitat effects. Mosquitofish treatments reduced the biomass of benthic filamentous algae, and crayfish treatments increased Daphnia and phytoplankton abundance. Combined effects of mosquitofish and crayfish were primarily positively or negatively additive, and completely offsetting for some responses, including gross primary production (GPP). Though co-invasion did not affect GPP, it strongly shifted primary production from the benthos into the water column. Effects on snail abundance revealed an interaction; snail abundance decreased only in the presence of both invaders. These results suggest that cross-habitat effects of co-invaders may lead to a variety of ecological outcomes; some of which may be unpredictable based on an understanding of each invader alone.
Keywords: Benthic–pelagic coupling; Biological invasions; Gambusia; Indirect effects; Procambarus.
Similar articles
-
Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems.Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jan;22(1):151-63. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13004. Epub 2015 Jul 24. Glob Chang Biol. 2016. PMID: 26212892 Review.
-
Estimating contributions of pelagic and benthic pathways to consumer production in coupled marine food webs.J Anim Ecol. 2019 Mar;88(3):405-415. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12929. Epub 2018 Dec 13. J Anim Ecol. 2019. PMID: 30548858
-
More invaders do not result in heavier impacts: The effects of non-native bullfrogs on native anurans are mitigated by high densities of non-native crayfish.J Anim Ecol. 2018 May;87(3):850-862. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12793. Epub 2018 Jan 22. J Anim Ecol. 2018. PMID: 29282711
-
Bottom-up and top-down effects of browning and warming on shallow lake food webs.Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Feb;25(2):504-521. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14521. Epub 2018 Dec 14. Glob Chang Biol. 2019. PMID: 30430702
-
The importance of benthic-pelagic coupling for marine ecosystem functioning in a changing world.Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jun;23(6):2179-2196. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13642. Epub 2017 Mar 22. Glob Chang Biol. 2017. PMID: 28132408 Review.
Cited by
-
Impacts of Single and Multiple Co-Existing Invasive Species on Subtropical Native Ant Communities.Ecol Evol. 2025 Sep 1;15(9):e72095. doi: 10.1002/ece3.72095. eCollection 2025 Sep. Ecol Evol. 2025. PMID: 40900727 Free PMC article.
-
Prey adaptation along a competition-defense tradeoff cryptically shifts trophic cascades from density- to trait-mediated.Oecologia. 2020 Mar;192(3):767-778. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04610-2. Epub 2020 Jan 27. Oecologia. 2020. PMID: 31989320
-
Invasive species drive cross-ecosystem effects worldwide.Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Jun;8(6):1087-1097. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02380-1. Epub 2024 Mar 19. Nat Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 38503866 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials