Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;182(2):519-28.
doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3663-9. Epub 2016 May 31.

Cross-habitat effects shape the ecosystem consequences of co-invasion by a pelagic and a benthic consumer

Affiliations

Cross-habitat effects shape the ecosystem consequences of co-invasion by a pelagic and a benthic consumer

David C Fryxell et al. Oecologia. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Invasive species can have major impacts on ecosystems, yet little work has addressed the combined effects of multiple invaders that exploit different habitats. Two common invaders in aquatic systems are pelagic fishes and crayfishes. Pelagic-oriented fish effects are typically strong on the pelagic food web, whereas crayfish effects are strong on the benthic food web. Thus, co-invasion may generate strong ecological responses in both habitats. We tested the effects of co-invasion on experimental pond ecosystems using two widespread invasive species, one pelagic (western mosquitofish) and one benthic (red swamp crayfish). As expected, mosquitofish had strong effects on the pelagic food web, reducing the abundance of Daphnia and causing a strong trophic cascade (increase in phytoplankton). Crayfish had strong effects on the benthic food web, reducing the abundance of benthic filamentous algae. Yet, we also found evidence for important cross-habitat effects. Mosquitofish treatments reduced the biomass of benthic filamentous algae, and crayfish treatments increased Daphnia and phytoplankton abundance. Combined effects of mosquitofish and crayfish were primarily positively or negatively additive, and completely offsetting for some responses, including gross primary production (GPP). Though co-invasion did not affect GPP, it strongly shifted primary production from the benthos into the water column. Effects on snail abundance revealed an interaction; snail abundance decreased only in the presence of both invaders. These results suggest that cross-habitat effects of co-invaders may lead to a variety of ecological outcomes; some of which may be unpredictable based on an understanding of each invader alone.

Keywords: Benthic–pelagic coupling; Biological invasions; Gambusia; Indirect effects; Procambarus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Science. 1972 Feb 11;175(4022):639-41 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 23;93(15):7723-6 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 2009 Feb;159(1):161-70 - PubMed
    1. Ecology. 2015 Aug;96(8):2035-41 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1983 Jun 24;220(4604):1404-7 - PubMed

Publication types