Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;29(2):101-5.
doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580721.

Multidisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Concomitant Rectal and Vaginal Prolapse

Karl Jallad  1 , Brooke Gurland  2
Affiliations
Review

Multidisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Concomitant Rectal and Vaginal Prolapse

Karl Jallad et al. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Rectal prolapse and vaginal prolapse have traditionally been treated as separate entities despite sharing a common pathophysiology. This compartmentalized approach often leads to frustration and suboptimal outcomes. In recent years, there has been a shift to a more patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach. Procedures to repair pelvic organ prolapse are divided into three categories: abdominal, perineal, and a combination of both. Most commonly, a combined minimally invasive abdominal sacral colpopexy and ventral rectopexy is performed to treat concomitant rectal and vaginal prolapse. Combining the two procedures adds little operative time and offers complete pelvic floor repair. The choice of minimally invasive abdominal prolapse repair versus perineal repair depends on the patient's comorbidities, previous surgeries, preference to avoid mesh, and physician's expertise. Surgeons should at least be able to identify these patients and provide the appropriate treatment or refer them to specialized centers.

Keywords: pelvic organ prolapse; rectopexy; sacral colpopexy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trocar placement for (A)laparoscopic and (B)robotic approaches with corresponding anatomy. (Reprinted with permission, Cleveland Clinic Center for Medical Art & Photography © 2010–2015. All Rights Reserved.)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conventional laparoscopic operating room setup and trocar placement. (Reprinted with permission, Cleveland Clinic Center for Medical Art & Photography © 2010–2015. All Rights Reserved.)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Operating room setup for a robotic-assisted prolapse repair. (Reprinted with permission, Cleveland Clinic Center for Medical Art & Photography © 2010–2015. All Rights Reserved.)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lim M, Sagar P M, Gonsalves S, Thekkinkattil D, Landon C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in females: functional outcome of mesh sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy as a combined procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(9):1412–1421. - PubMed
    1. González-Argenté F X, Jain A, Nogueras J J, Davila G W, Weiss E G, Wexner S D. Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(7):920–926. - PubMed
    1. Collopy B T Barham K A Abdominal colporectopexy with pelvic cul-de-sac closure Dis Colon Rectum 2002454522–526., discussion 526–529 - PubMed
    1. Baessler K, Schuessler B. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and anatomy and function of the posterior compartment. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(5, Pt 1):678–684. - PubMed
    1. Cundiff G W, Varner E, Visco A G. et al.Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):6880–6.88E7. - PMC - PubMed