Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 29;4(3):292-302.
doi: 10.1002/mgg3.204. eCollection 2016 May.

Carrier screening by next-generation sequencing: health benefits and cost effectiveness

Affiliations

Carrier screening by next-generation sequencing: health benefits and cost effectiveness

Mohammad Azimi et al. Mol Genet Genomic Med. .

Abstract

Background: Compared with conventional genotyping, which typically tests for a limited number of mutations, next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) provides increased accuracy for carrier screening. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of carrier screening using NGS versus genotyping for 14 of the recessive disorders for which medical society guidelines recommend screening.

Methods: Data from published literature, population surveys, and expert opinion were used to develop a decision tree model capturing decisions and outcomes related to carrier screening and reproductive health.

Results: Modeling a population of 1,000,000 couples that was representative of the United States population and that contained 83,421 carriers of pathogenic mutations, carrier screening using NGS averted 21 additional affected births as compared with genotyping, and reduced costs by approximately $13 million. As compared with no screening, NGS carrier screening averted 223 additional affected births. The results are sensitive to assumptions regarding mutation detection rates and carrier frequencies in multiethnic populations.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that NGS-based carrier screening offers the greater benefit in clinical outcomes and lower total healthcare cost as compared with genotyping.

Keywords: Carrier screening; cost effectiveness; genotyping; next‐generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decision tree: (A) preconception branch and (B) prenatal and no screening branches.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Projected composition of carrier status by ethnicity (simulated data), all disorders considered. Note the logarithmic y‐axis which shows orders of magnitude difference between number of couples and carrier couples.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Number of affected births prevented using next‐generation DNA sequencing (NGS) versus genotyping for carrier screening (simulated data). (B) Total life years gained from cases of genetic disorders averted (simulated data). (C) Healthcare costs for different screening scenarios (simulated data).

References

    1. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . 2009. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 442: preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of Eastern European Jewish descent. Obstet. Gynecol. 114:950–953. - PubMed
    1. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . 2011. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 486: update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 117:1028–1031. - PubMed
    1. Amos, J. , Feldman G. L., Grody W. W., Monaghan K., Palomaki G. E., and Prior T.. 2006. American College of Medical Genetics: technical standards and guidelines for CFTR mutation testing: 2006 Edition [Online]. American College of Medical Genetics, Bethesda, MD: Available at https://www.acmg.net/Pages/ACMG_Activities/stds-2002/cf.htm (accessed 20 June 2014).
    1. Arias, E. 2014. United States life tables, 2009. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD: Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr62/nvsr62_07.pdf. Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 62:1–63. - PubMed
    1. Bell, C. J. , Dinwiddie D. L., Miller N. A., Hateley S. L., Ganusova E. E., Mudge J., et al. 2011. Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next‐generation sequencing. Sci. Transl. Med. 3:65ra64. - PMC - PubMed