Utility of testing for apraxia and associated features in dementia
- PMID: 27251676
- PMCID: PMC5099316
- DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-312945
Utility of testing for apraxia and associated features in dementia
Abstract
Introduction: Existing literature suggests that the presence or absence of apraxia and associated parietal deficits may be clinically relevant in differential diagnosis of dementia syndromes.
Aim: This study investigated the profile of these features in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum disorders, at first presentation.
Methods: Retrospective case note analysis was undertaken in 111 patients who presented to the Oxford Cognitive Disorders Clinic, Oxford, UK, including 29 amnestic AD, 12 posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), 12 logopenic primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), 20 behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD), 7 non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA), 6 semantic variant PPA (svPPA) and 25 patients with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI). The clinical features of interest were: limb apraxia, apraxia of speech (AOS), and left parietal symptoms of dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia.
Results: The prevalence of limb apraxia was highest in PCA, amnestic AD, lvPPA and nfvPPA. AOS was only observed in nfvPPA. Associated parietal features were more prevalent in AD spectrum than FTD spectrum disorders. Group comparisons between key differential diagnostic challenges showed that lvPPA and nfvPPA could be significantly differentiated on the presence of left parietal features and AOS, and amnestic AD could be differentiated from bvFTD, svPPA and SCI by limb apraxia. Regression analysis showed that limb apraxia could successfully differentiate between AD and FTLD spectrum disorders with 83% accuracy.
Discussion: Disease-specific profiles of limb apraxia and associated deficits can be observed. FTD and AD spectrum disorders can be difficult to differentiate due to overlapping cognitive symptoms, and measures of apraxia, in particular, appear to be a promising discriminator.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Comment in
-
Why patients with dementia need a motor examination.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;87(11):1157. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-313466. Epub 2016 Jun 3. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27261501 No abstract available.
References
-
- Geschwind N. The apraxias: neural mechanisms of disorders of learned movement. Am Sci 1975;63:188–95. - PubMed
-
- Liepmann H. Das Krankheitsbild der Apraxie (motorische Asymbolie) auf Grund eines Falles von einseitiger Apraxie. Monatschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie 1900;8:102–32.
-
- Hodges JR. Cognitive assessment for clinicians. 2nd edn Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
-
- McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. . The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from The National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011;7:263–9. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical