Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;17(6):32.
doi: 10.1007/s11864-016-0403-7.

Optimal Imaging Strategies for Rectal Cancer Staging and Ongoing Management

Affiliations
Review

Optimal Imaging Strategies for Rectal Cancer Staging and Ongoing Management

Svetlana Balyasnikova et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Imaging determines the optimal treatment for rectal cancer patients. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) overcomes many of the known limitations of previous methods. When performed in accordance with the recommended standards, MRI enables accurate staging of both early and advanced rectal cancer, accurate response assessment, the delineation of recurrent disease and planning surgical treatment in a safe and effective manner. Tumour-related high-risk features with known adverse outcomes can be preoperatively identified and treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Further, MRI post-treatment tumour response assessment using TRG grading system also predicts the likely survival outcomes and in the future will be used to modify treatment further by stratification into good and poor responders. There is a paucity of literature with validated outcome data concerning use of diffusion-weighted imaging and positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), and in the absence of any validated methods and outcome data, their use in the initial assessment and restaging after treatment is limited to research protocols. Combination MRI and CT is essential for distant spread assessment and recurrent disease, and currently PET-CT is sometimes used in the workup of patients with recurrent and metastatic disease.

Keywords: CRM; EMVI; ERUS; Early and advanced rectal cancer; High-resolution MRI; N stage; PET/CT; Rectal cancer staging; Recurrent and mucinous rectal cancer; Response assessment; T stage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
    1. Logan RF, et al. Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut. 2012;61(10):1439–46. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300843. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown G, et al. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg. 2003;90(3):355–64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor FG, et al. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(1):34–43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3258. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith NJ, et al. Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging-detected extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95(2):229–36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5917. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore HG, et al. Colorectal cancer pelvic recurrences: determinants of resectability. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(10):1599–606. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0677-x. - DOI - PubMed