Laparoendoscopic single site surgery in pediatric urology: does it require specialized tools?
- PMID: 27256182
- PMCID: PMC4871388
- DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0444
Laparoendoscopic single site surgery in pediatric urology: does it require specialized tools?
Abstract
Purpose: To describe our experience utilizing Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery in pediatric urology.
Materials and methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on LESS urologic procedures from November 2009 through March 2013. A total of 44 patients underwent 54 procedures including: nephrectomy (23), orchiopexy (14), varicocelectomy (9), orchiectomy (2), urachal cyst excision (3), and antegrade continence enema (3) (ACE).
Results: Median patient age was 6.9 years old. Estimated blood loss (EBL), ranged from less than 5cc to 47cc for a bilateral nephrectomy. Operative time varied from 56 mins for varicocelectomy to a median of 360 minutes for a bilateral nephroureterectomy. Incision length ranged between 2 and 2.5cm. In our initial experience we used a commercial port. However, as we progressed, we were able to perform the majority of our procedures via adjacent fascial punctures for instrumentation at the single incision site. One patient did require conversion to an open procedure as a result of bleeding. Three complications were noted (6.8%), with two Clavien Grade 3b complications. Two patients required additional procedures at 1-year follow-up.
Conclusions: The use of LESS applies to many pediatric urologic procedures, ideally for ablative procedures or simple reconstructive efforts. The use of adjacent fascial puncture sites for instrumentation can obviate the need for a commercial port or multiple trocars.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Complications and conversions of upper tract urological laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS): multicentre experience: results from the NOTES Working Group.BJU Int. 2011 Apr;107(8):1284-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09663.x. Epub 2010 Sep 14. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 20840326
-
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology using conventional instruments: our initial experience.J Endourol. 2013 Nov;27(11):1354-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0311. Epub 2013 Sep 17. J Endourol. 2013. PMID: 23914819
-
Laparoscopic single site surgery: initial experience and description of techniques in the pediatric population.J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4 Suppl):1653-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.100. Epub 2011 Aug 19. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21855906
-
Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Where Do We Stand Today?Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Oct;16(10):68. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0542-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2015. PMID: 26255067 Review.
-
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: where have we been and where are we heading?Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008 Oct;5(10):561-8. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro1215. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008. PMID: 18836465 Review.
Cited by
-
Single-Site Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology.Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Apr 17;19(6):42. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0794-z. Curr Urol Rep. 2018. PMID: 29667065 Review.
-
Advantages of single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy for palpable undescended testes in children: a prospective comparison study.Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Jan 12;40(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05630-8. Pediatr Surg Int. 2024. PMID: 38214758 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina R, Aron M, Irwin BH, Canes D, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial hundred patients. Urology. 2009;74:805–812. - PubMed
-
- Dutta S. Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1741–1745. - PubMed
-
- Marietti S, DeCambre M, Fairbanks T, Kling K, Chiang G. Early experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in the pediatric urology patient population. J Endourol. 2010;24:1321–1324. - PubMed
-
- Tam YH, Pang KK, Tsui SY, Wong YS, Wong HY, Mou JW, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy and heminephroureterectomy in children using standard laparoscopic setup versus conventional laparoscopy. Urology. 2013;82:430–435. - PubMed
-
- Park SK, Olweny EO, Best SL, Tracy CR, Mir SA, Cadeddu JA. Patient-reported body image and cosmesis outcomes following kidney surgery: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, laparoscopic, and open surgery. Eur Urol. 2011;60:1097–1104. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous