Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Jul;47(7):1817-24.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012995. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

Clinical Outcomes of Transplanted Modified Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Stroke: A Phase 1/2a Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Clinical Outcomes of Transplanted Modified Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Stroke: A Phase 1/2a Study

Gary K Steinberg et al. Stroke. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Preclinical data suggest that cell-based therapies have the potential to improve stroke outcomes.

Methods: Eighteen patients with stable, chronic stroke were enrolled in a 2-year, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of surgical transplantation of modified bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (SB623).

Results: All patients in the safety population (N=18) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event. Six patients experienced 6 serious treatment-emergent adverse events; 2 were probably or definitely related to surgical procedure; none were related to cell treatment. All serious treatment-emergent adverse events resolved without sequelae. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or deaths. Sixteen patients completed 12 months of follow-up at the time of this analysis. Significant improvement from baseline (mean) was reported for: (1) European Stroke Scale: mean increase 6.88 (95% confidence interval, 3.5-10.3; P<0.001), (2) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: mean decrease 2.00 (95% confidence interval, -2.7 to -1.3; P<0.001), (3) Fugl-Meyer total score: mean increase 19.20 (95% confidence interval, 11.4-27.0; P<0.001), and (4) Fugl-Meyer motor function total score: mean increase 11.40 (95% confidence interval, 4.6-18.2; P<0.001). No changes were observed in modified Rankin Scale. The area of magnetic resonance T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery signal change in the ipsilateral cortex 1 week after implantation significantly correlated with clinical improvement at 12 months (P<0.001 for European Stroke Scale).

Conclusions: In this interim report, SB623 cells were safe and associated with improvement in clinical outcome end points at 12 months.

Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01287936.

Keywords: Notch 1; allogeneic transplantation; mesenchymal stromal cells; phase 1 clinical trial; stem cells; stereotactic techniques; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A–D, Change of clinical outcome end points from baseline for pooled SB623 cells at 12 months (intent-to-treat population, n=18). (A) European Stroke Scale. (B) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. (C) Fugl-Meyer (F-M) total score. (D) F-M motor function total score. Error bars represent SEM. P values represent significance of change vs baseline using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P<0.05), which were not corrected for multiplicity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A–D, MR brain scans from a 39-year-old female patient, transplanted with SB623 cells 2 years after a left middle cerebral artery stroke. (A left) Axial T2 FSE pretransplant showing the subcortical and cortical infarct. (A right) Pretransplant at higher axial level. (B) Day 1 post-transplant at higher axial level demonstrating small amount of blood in left frontal sulci. (C) Day 7 post-transplant at higher axial level showing new T2 FLAIR signal abnormality in left superior frontal gyrus adjacent to premotor gyrus. (D) Month 2 post-transplant at higher axial level showing resolution of T2 FLAIR signal abnormality. FLAIR indicates fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; FSE, fast spin echo; and MR, magnetic resonance.

Comment in

References

    1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:e2–e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lo AC, Guarino P, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever CT, Duncan PW, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of robot-assisted rehabilitation for chronic stroke: methods and entry characteristics for VA ROBOTICS. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:775–783. doi: 10.1177/1545968309338195. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lemmens R, Steinberg GK. Stem cell therapy for acute cerebral injury: what do we know and what will the future bring? Curr Opin Neurol. 2013;26:617–625. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. George P, Steinberg GK. Cell based therapies for stroke. In: Micieli G, Amantea D, editors. Rational Basis for Clinical Translation in Stroke Therapy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014. pp. 427–445. (Frontiers in Neurotherapeutics Series)
    1. Kondziolka D, Steinberg GK, Wechsler L, Meltzer CC, Elder E, Gebel J, et al. Neurotransplantation for patients with subcortical motor stroke: a phase 2 randomized trial. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:38–45. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.1.0038. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data