Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;20(1):55-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 May 6.

Validation of the SenseWear Mini activity monitor in 5-12-year-old children

Affiliations

Validation of the SenseWear Mini activity monitor in 5-12-year-old children

Christiana M T van Loo et al. J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to validate SenseWear Mini software algorithm versions 2.2 (SW2.2) and 5.2 (SW5.2) for estimating energy expenditure (EE) in children.

Design: Laboratory-based validation study.

Methods: 57 children aged 5-12 y completed a protocol involving 15 semi-structured sedentary (SED), light-intensity (LPA), and moderate- to vigorous-intensity (MVPA) physical activities. EE was estimated using portable indirect calorimetry (IC). The accuracy of EE estimates (kcal·min-1) from SW2.2 and SW5.2 were examined at the group level and individual level using the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), Bland-Altman plots and equivalence testing.

Results: MAPE values were lower for SW5.2 (30.1±10.7%) than for SW2.2 (44.0±6.2%). Although mean differences for SW5.2 were smaller than for SW2.2 during SED (-0.23±0.22 vs. -0.61±0.20kcal·min-1), LPA (-0.69±0.76 vs. -1.07±0.46kcal·min-1) and MVPA (-2.22±1.15 vs. -2.57±1.15kcal·min-1), limits of agreement did not decrease for the updated algorithms. For all activities, SW2.2 and SW5.2 were not equivalent to IC (p>0.05). Errors increased with increasing intensity.

Conclusion: The current SenseWear Mini algorithms SW5.2 underestimated EE. The overall improved accuracy for SW5.2 was not accompanied with improved accuracy at the individual level and EE estimates were not equivalent to IC.

Keywords: Accelerometry; Calorimetry; Energy expenditure; Physical activity; Validation study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean absolute percentage error of algorithms version 2.2 (SW2.2) and 5.2 (SW5.2) relative to the criterion measure portable indirect calorimetry across all the activities.
Figure 2
Figure 2
95% equivalence test for logarithmically transformed energy expenditure data across sedentary (SED), light- (LPA) and moderate- to vigorous-intensity (MVPA) physical activities. Methods are equivalent if 90% confidence intervals lie entirely within the equivalence region of IC. *IC, indirect calorimetry; SW2.2, algorithms version 2.2; SW5.2, algorithms version 5.2.

References

    1. Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wareham NJ, van Sluijs EMF, Ekelund U. Physical activity and obesity prevention: a review of the current evidence. Proc Nutr Soc. 2005;64(2):229–247. - PubMed
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Health Survey: Physical Activity. Australian Bureau of Statistics; Canberra: 2011–12.
    1. Riddoch CJ, Bo Andersen L, Wedderkopp N, et al. Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(1):86–92. - PubMed
    1. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1):181–188. - PubMed

Publication types