Tuning noninvasive brain stimulation with MRI to cope with intersubject variability
- PMID: 27257946
- DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000353
Tuning noninvasive brain stimulation with MRI to cope with intersubject variability
Abstract
Purpose of review: The review aims at highlighting the additional benefit that can be gained from combining noninvasive brain stimulation as well as repetitive sensory stimulation protocols with MRI techniques to account for the intersubject variability observed in those treatments. Potentially, this should help to identify predictive patterns in the individual receptiveness to the treatment.
Recent findings: Knowledge about the underlying physiological principles of excitability changes as induced by noninvasive brain stimulation or repetitive sensory stimulation is accumulating, revealing strong associations with plasticity processes at the synaptic level. In this context, MRI techniques, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy and functional MRI, emerged as valuable tools for the qualitative assessment of baseline states and induced changes. Those physiological readouts can help explain the interindividual heterogeneity found in behavioural and/or clinical responses to the specific stimulation protocols. This knowledge will eventually translate, first, into the preliminary classification of study participants into treatment groups according to their neurophysiological baseline state and expected responses to a particular stimulation. Subsequently, this should also aid the optimization of stimulation protocols according to the classification outcome, resulting in retuned protocols for particular groups of study participants.
Summary: The consistent MRI-based monitoring of stimulation effects in the neural network promises a considerable gain for the customization of intervention protocols with improved therapeutic potential and rehabilitative predictions.
Similar articles
-
Functional neuroimaging and transcranial electrical stimulation.Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012 Jul;43(3):200-8. doi: 10.1177/1550059412444978. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22956648
-
Transcranial brain stimulation: closing the loop between brain and stimulation.Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 Aug;29(4):397-404. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000342. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016. PMID: 27224087 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition.Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012 Jul;43(3):192-9. doi: 10.1177/1550059412444975. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22956647 Review.
-
Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and neuroimaging: novel insights in understanding neuroplasticity.J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):1-4. doi: 10.1152/jn.00557.2011. Epub 2011 Aug 10. J Neurophysiol. 2012. PMID: 21832036 Free PMC article.
-
Plasticity.Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:525-34. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00041-3. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013. PMID: 24112920 Review.
Cited by
-
Anodal tDCS Enhances Verbal Episodic Memory in Initially Low Performers.Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Nov 7;11:542. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00542. eCollection 2017. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 29163115 Free PMC article.
-
No Effect of Anodal tDCS on Verbal Episodic Memory Performance and Neurotransmitter Levels in Young and Elderly Participants.Neural Plast. 2020 Sep 22;2020:8896791. doi: 10.1155/2020/8896791. eCollection 2020. Neural Plast. 2020. PMID: 33029128 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials