Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;95(22):e3812.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003812.

Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe: Implementation and Outcomes

Affiliations

Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe: Implementation and Outcomes

Masoud Babaei et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of colorectal cancer (CRC) was first introduced over 20 years ago and recently has gained increasing acceptance and usage beyond clinical trials. However, data on dissemination of the method across countries and on long-term outcomes are still sparse.In the context of a European collaborative study, a total of 112,023 CRC cases from 3 population-based (N = 109,695) and 4 institute-based clinical cancer registries (N = 2328) were studied and compared on the utilization of MIS versus open surgery. Cox regression models were applied to study associations between surgery type and survival of patients from the population-based registries. The study considered adjustment for potential confounders.The percentage of CRC patients undergoing MIS differed substantially between centers and generally increased over time. MIS was significantly less often used in stage II to IV colon cancer compared with stage I in most centers. MIS tended to be less often used in older (70+) than in younger colon cancer patients. MIS tended to be more often used in women than in men with rectal cancer. MIS was associated with significantly reduced mortality among colon cancer patients in the Netherlands (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.63-0.69), Sweden (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.60-0.76), and Norway (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.79). Likewise, MIS was associated with reduced mortality of rectal cancer patients in the Netherlands (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.80) and Sweden (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90).Utilization of MIS in CRC resection is increasing, but large variation between European countries and clinical centers prevails. Our results support association of MIS with substantially enhanced survival among colon cancer patients. Further studies controlling for selection bias and residual confounding are needed to establish role of MIS in survival of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Age-standardized trend of utilization of MIS in patients with colon (A) and rectal cancer (B) between 2007 and 2014. The by far largest database (NNCR) was used as standard population for age standardization. IJB = Institute Jules Bordet in Brussels, IPO-Porto = Portuguese Institute of Oncology in Porto, NCR = Norwegian Cancer Registry, NCT-HD = National Centre for Tumor Diseases in Heidelberg, NKI = Netherlands Cancer Institute, NNCR = Netherlands National Cancer Registry, SCRCR = Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Survival of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open resectional surgery (ORS) estimated from Cox regression models with adjustment for sex, age group, tumor stage, neoadjuvant therapy, examined lymph nodes, colon tumor location (for colon cancer group only) in Netherlands (NNCR), Sweden (SCRCR), and Norway (NCR). Emergent surgeries excluded in SCRCR data (n = 5074; 14%). NCR = Norwegian Cancer Registry, NNCR = Netherlands National Cancer Registry, SCRCR = Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry.

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65:87–108. - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015; 136:E359–E386. - PubMed
    1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1:144–150. - PubMed
    1. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365:1718–1726. - PubMed
    1. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13:413–424. - PubMed