Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;97(9):2201-2209.
doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000517. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

The B-cell response to foot-and-mouth-disease virus in cattle following vaccination and live-virus challenge

Affiliations

The B-cell response to foot-and-mouth-disease virus in cattle following vaccination and live-virus challenge

Clare F J Grant et al. J Gen Virol. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Antibodies play a pivotal role against viral infection, and maintenance of protection is dependent on plasma and memory B-cells. Understanding antigen-specific B-cell responses in cattle is essential to inform future vaccine design. We have previously defined T-cell-dependent and -independent B-cell responses in cattle, as a prelude to investigating foot-and-mouth-disease-virus (FMDV)-specific B-cell responses. In this study, we have used an FMDV O-serotype vaccination (O1-Manisa or O SKR) and live-virus challenge (FMDV O SKR) to investigate the homologous and heterologous B-cell response in cattle following both vaccination and live-virus challenge. The FMDV O-serotype vaccines were able to induce a cross-reactive plasma-cell response, specific for both O1-Manisa and O SKR, post-vaccination. Post-FMDV O SKR live-virus challenge, the heterologous O1-Manisa vaccination provided cross-protection against O SKR challenge and cross-reactive O SKR-specific plasma cells were induced. However, vaccination and live-virus challenge were not able to induce a detectable FMDV O-serotype-specific memory B-cell response in any of the cattle. The aim of new FMDV vaccines should be to induce memory responses and increased duration of immunity in cattle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Kinetics of the FMDV-O-serotype-specific plasma-cell response in cattle post-vaccination and live-virus challenge. Kinetics of the O-serotype FMDV-specific plasma-cell response post-vaccination and intradermolingual live-FMDV-O-SKR-virus challenge (indicated by vertical dotted line). (a) FMDV O1-Manisa-vaccinated animals (O1M group, black symbols, n=5), (b) FMDV O-SKR-vaccinated animals (OSKR group, open symbols, n=5) and (c) non-vaccinated controls (NVC group, grey symbols, n=3). On all of the graphs, the FMDV O1-Manisa-specific ASCs are shown as circle symbols and FMDV-O-SKR-specific ASCs shown as square symbols. Results are expressed as the grouped mean of duplicate determinations from each calf±sd. Statistically significant time points, as compared with 0 dpc (P<0.05) are indicated with a * symbol.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Kinetics of the FMDV O-serotype-specific liquid-phase-blocking antibody response in cattle post-vaccination and live-virus challenge. Kinetics of the (a) FMDV O-SKR-specific and (b) FMDV O1-Manisa-specific liquid-phase-blocking antibody titres post-vaccination and FMDV O-SKR live-virus challenge in the FMDV O1-Manisa vaccinated cohort (black symbols), the FMDV-O-SKR-vaccinated cohort (open symbols) and the non-vaccinated controls (grey symbols). Results are expressed as the log10 transformed grouped mean of duplicate determinations from each calf±sd Statistically significant time points, as compared with 0 dpc (P≤0.05), indicated by * symbol (FMDV O1-Manisa vaccinated cohort = black, FMDV O-SKR vaccinated cohort = blue).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Kinetics of the FMDV-O-serotype-specific virus-neutralizing antibody response in cattle post-vaccination and live-virus challenge. Kinetics of the O-serotype (a) FMDV O-SKR-specific and (b) FMDV O1-Manisa-specific virus neutralization (VN) titre post-vaccination and FMDV-O-SKR live-virus challenge in the FMDV O1-Manisa-vaccinated cohort (black symbols), the FMDV O-SKR-vaccinated cohort (open symbols) and the non-vaccinated controls (grey symbols). Results are expressed as the log10 transformed grouped mean of duplicate determinations from each calf±sd. Statistically significant time points, as compared with 0 dpc (P≤0.05), indicated by * symbol, (FMDV O1-Manisa vaccinated cohort = black, FMDV O-SKR-vaccinated cohort = blue).

References

    1. Aiba Y., Kometani K., Hamadate M., Moriyama S., Sakaue-Sawano A., Tomura M., Luche H., Fehling H. J., Casellas R., et al. (2010). Preferential localization of IgG memory B cells adjacent to contracted germinal centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 12192–12197.10.1073/pnas.1005443107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachmann M. F., Zinkernagel R. M.(1997). Neutralizing antiviral B cell responses. Annu Rev Immunol 15 235–270.10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.235 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baumgarth N.(2013). How specific is too specific? B-cell responses to viral infections reveal the importance of breadth over depth. Immunol Rev 255 82–94.10.1111/imr.12094 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernasconi N. L., Traggiai E., Lanzavecchia A.(2002). Maintenance of serological memory by polyclonal activation of human memory B cells. Science 298 2199–2202.10.1126/science.1076071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brehm K. E., Kumar N., Thulke H. H., Haas B.(2008). High potency vaccines induce protection against heterologous challenge with foot-and-mouth disease virus. Vaccine 26 1681–1687.10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.038 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources