Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul:86:93-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

Which outcome measures are reported by clinical trials investigating OME treatment? A case for standardised reporting

Robert Chessman  1 , Tawakir Kamani  2 , John P Birchall  3 , Johanna G Barry  4 , Matija Daniel  3
Affiliations
Review

Which outcome measures are reported by clinical trials investigating OME treatment? A case for standardised reporting

Robert Chessman et al. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Many different OME treatment trials have been published using different outcomes measures to evaluate the success of particular interventions. We set out to identify the variation in reporting of outcome measures in OME trials that exists at present. This has been achieved by reviewing published trials to determine which outcome measures have been reported.

Method: The literature review was carried out using PUBMED database (1980 to 2013). Data were collected on the treatment outcomes reported, with particular focus on the methods of assessment and the number of treatment outcomes used in each study.

Results: The 171 studies identified used 12 broad treatment outcome measures. The most common outcome measure was OME resolution (48%) followed by hearing level (36%). Only 95 studies used a single outcome measure, with 76 studies using between 2 and 4 outcome measures. The method of assessment varied between studies that used the same treatment outcome measures.

Conclusion: OME treatment trials report a wide range of measures and comparison across studies is thus difficult. Establishing a core set of outcome measures to be reported by all trials in the future could be useful, and would allow comprehensive comparison of different studies and minimise potential for reporting bias.

Keywords: Clinical trial; Otitis media; Outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection for inclusion in literature review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fried VM, Mukuc DM, Rooks RN. Ambulatory health care visits by children: principle diagnosis and places of visit. Vital Health Statistics. 1998;13:1–23. - PubMed
    1. Gates GA. Cost-effectiveness considerations in otitis media treatment. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery. 1996;114:525–530. - PubMed
    1. Bondy J, Berman S, Glazner J, et al. Direct expenditures related to otitis media diagnosis: extrapolations from a pediatric Medicaid cohort. Pediatrics. 2000;105:e72. - PubMed
    1. NICE. Surgical Management of Children with Otitis Media with Effusion (OME) London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2008.
    1. Rosenfeld RM, Kay D. Natural history of untreated otitis media with effusion. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(10):1645–57. - PubMed

MeSH terms