Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug:89:337-344.
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.033. Epub 2016 May 31.

Shared vision, shared vulnerability: A content analysis of corporate social responsibility information on tobacco industry websites

Affiliations

Shared vision, shared vulnerability: A content analysis of corporate social responsibility information on tobacco industry websites

Patricia A McDaniel et al. Prev Med. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Tobacco companies rely on corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives to improve their public image and advance their political objectives, which include thwarting or undermining tobacco control policies. For these reasons, implementation guidelines for the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) recommend curtailing or prohibiting tobacco industry CSR. To understand how and where major tobacco companies focus their CSR resources, we explored CSR-related content on 4 US and 4 multinational tobacco company websites in February 2014. The websites described a range of CSR-related activities, many common across all companies, and no programs were unique to a particular company. The websites mentioned CSR activities in 58 countries, representing nearly every region of the world. Tobacco companies appear to have a shared vision about what constitutes CSR, due perhaps to shared vulnerabilities. Most countries that host tobacco company CSR programs are parties to the FCTC, highlighting the need for full implementation of the treaty, and for funding to monitor CSR activity, replace industry philanthropy, and enforce existing bans.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; Framework Convention on Tobacco Control; Tobacco industry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Carroll AB. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Bus & Society. 1999;38(3):268–295.
    1. Landman A, Ling PM, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(6):917–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mamudu HM, Hammond R, Glantz SA. Project Cerberus: tobacco industry strategy to create an alternative to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(9):1630–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tesler LE, Malone RE. Corporate philanthropy, lobbying, and public health policy. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(12):2123–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDaniel PA, Malone RE. British American Tobacco's partnership with Earthwatch Europe and its implications for public health. Glob Public Health. 2012;7(1):14–28. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types