Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;116(8):1295-1307.e6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

A Systematic Review to Assess Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Interventions for Children and Adolescents across the Socioecological Model

A Systematic Review to Assess Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Interventions for Children and Adolescents across the Socioecological Model

Hannah Lane et al. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption among children and adolescents is a determinant of childhood obesity. Many programs to reduce consumption across the socioecological model report significant positive results; however, the generalizability of the results, including whether reporting differences exist among socioecological strategy levels, is unknown. This systematic review aimed to examine the extent to which studies reported internal and external validity indicators defined by the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) model and assess reporting differences by socioecological level: Intrapersonal/interpersonal (Level 1), environmental/policy (Level 2), and multilevel (Combined Level). A systematic literature review was conducted in six major databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cinahl, CAB Abstracts, Education Research Information Center, and Arcola) to identify studies from 2004-2015 meeting inclusion criteria (children aged 3 to 12 years, adolescents aged 13 to 17 years, and young adults aged 18 years, experimental or quasiexperimental, and substantial SSB component). Interventions were categorized by socioecological level, and data were extracted using a validated RE-AIM protocol. One-way analysis of variance assessed differences between levels. There were 55 eligible studies accepted, including 21 Level 1, 18 Level 2, and 16 Combined Level studies. Thirty-six studies (65%) were conducted in the United States, 19 studies (35%) were conducted internationally, and 39 studies (71%) were implemented in schools. Across levels, reporting averages were low for all RE-AIM dimensions (reach=29%, efficacy or effectiveness=45%, adoption=26%, implementation=27%, and maintenance=14%). Level 2 studies had significantly lower reporting on reach and effectiveness (10% and 26%, respectively) compared with Level 1 (44% and 57%, respectively) or Combined Level studies (31% and 52%, respectively) (P<0.001). Adoption, implementation, and maintenance reporting did not vary among levels. Interventions to reduce SSB consumption in children and adolescents across the socioecological spectrum do not provide the necessary information for dissemination and implementation in community nutrition settings. Future interventions should address both internal and external validity to maximize population influence.

Keywords: Beverages; Children and adolescents; Review; Systematic; Youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors of “Assessing the internal and external validity of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption interventions for children and adolescents: a systematic RE-AIM review using a socio-ecological approach” have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research study selection criteria of experimental, and quasi-experimental SSB studies in children and adolescents.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluating socio-ecological strategy levels that address internal and external validity in child and adolescent (3–18 years) sugar-sweetened beverage consumption studies (n=55)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean proportion reporting of RE-AIM indicators by study characteristics a. Comprehensiveness of Reporting (COR) score: studies of “low” quality (L) had reported <33% of indicators, studies of “moderate” quality (M) reported between 33% and 67% of indicators, and studies considered “high” quality (H) reported >67% Figure 3a: Socio-ecological level.; Figure 3b: Study-design; Figure 3c: Country; Figure 3d: Setting

References

    1. Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clinical Nutrition. 2013 Epub ahead of print August 21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu FB. Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related disease. Obesity Reviews. 2013;14:606–619. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kit BK, Fakhouri THI, Park S, Nielsen SJ, Ogden CL. Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999–2010. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:180–188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrington S. The role of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in adolescent obesity: a review of the literature. J Sch Nurs. 2008;24(1):3–12. - PubMed
    1. Morenga LT, Mallard S, Mann J. Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ. 2013;346:e7492. - PubMed

Publication types