Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;14(4):138-50.
doi: 10.1007/s11914-016-0314-3.

Tissue-Level Mechanical Properties of Bone Contributing to Fracture Risk

Affiliations
Review

Tissue-Level Mechanical Properties of Bone Contributing to Fracture Risk

Jeffry S Nyman et al. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Tissue-level mechanical properties characterize mechanical behavior independently of microscopic porosity. Specifically, quasi-static nanoindentation provides measurements of modulus (stiffness) and hardness (resistance to yielding) of tissue at the length scale of the lamella, while dynamic nanoindentation assesses time-dependent behavior in the form of storage modulus (stiffness), loss modulus (dampening), and loss factor (ratio of the two). While these properties are useful in establishing how a gene, signaling pathway, or disease of interest affects bone tissue, they generally do not vary with aging after skeletal maturation or with osteoporosis. Heterogeneity in tissue-level mechanical properties or in compositional properties may contribute to fracture risk, but a consensus on whether the contribution is negative or positive has not emerged. In vivo indentation of bone tissue is now possible, and the mechanical resistance to microindentation has the potential for improving fracture risk assessment, though determinants are currently unknown.

Keywords: Bone quality; Bound water; Hardness; Nanoindentation; Spectroscopy; Viscoelasticity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tissue-level mechanical properties are often determined from quas-static (a) or dynamic (b) nanonindentation tests of bone samples with polished surfaces (c). Arrows or a box mark the indents, which appear as triangles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lewis G, Nyman JS. The use of nanoindentation for characterizing the properties of mineralized hard tissues: state-of-the art review. Journal of biomedical materials research Part B, Applied biomaterials. 2008;87(1):286–301. - PubMed
    1. Thurner PJ. Atomic force microscopy and indentation force measurement of bone. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2009;1(6):624–49. - PubMed
    1. Liu XS, Stein EM, Zhou B, Zhang CA, Nickolas TL, Cohen A, et al. Individual trabecula segmentation (ITS)-based morphological analyses and microfinite element analysis of HR-pQCT images discriminate postmenopausal fragility fractures independent of DXA measurements. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(2):263–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nishiyama KK, Macdonald HM, Hanley DA, Boyd SK. Women with previous fragility fractures can be classified based on bone microarchitecture and finite element analysis measured with HR-pQCT. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(5):1733–40. - PubMed
    1. Chang G, Honig S, Liu Y, Chen C, Chu KK, Rajapakse CS, et al. 7 Tesla MRI of bone microarchitecture discriminates between women without and with fragility fractures who do not differ by bone mineral density. Journal of bone and mineral metabolism. 2015;33(3):285–93. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types